Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,468 Year: 3,725/9,624 Month: 596/974 Week: 209/276 Day: 49/34 Hour: 0/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why This Belief?
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 111 (212961)
06-01-2005 12:29 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by mikehager
05-31-2005 5:28 PM


Re: Relative truth or absolute truth?
I don't think Jesus was a con man because he didn't gain anything from the con, and he allowed himself to be crucified seemingly defeating the purpose of a con.
I believe that Jesus spoke so much truth (about the way you should live your life, etc.) that I can believe everything that he said, including being the son of god.
I also feel like I got called back to Jesus (after a short bit of atheism), so when you say:
There is no evidence for Christ's divinity
keep in mind that you have no evidence but there could be evidence for other. Its too bad, for you, that this evidence cannot be substantiated, but then, that would make it all too easy and rid life of "the most potent element of human existance" ... faith.
non-shaded quote from System of a Down "Science"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by mikehager, posted 05-31-2005 5:28 PM mikehager has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by mikehager, posted 06-01-2005 12:15 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 111 (213206)
06-01-2005 4:30 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by mikehager
06-01-2005 12:15 PM


Re: Relative truth or absolute truth?
That faith is the most potent element of human existence is your unporvable opinion.
Duh!? And your posts contain your opinions. Thanks Captain Obvious.
Then it isn't evidence. Evidence works for everyone if it really is evidence. There is no such thing as evidence for you but not for me.
evidence ( P ) Pronunciation Key (v-dns)
n.
A thing or things helpful in forming a conclusion or judgment
I felt something that helped me form a conclusion. It cannot be substantiated but I still call it evidence. Perhaps you'd use a different definition for the word, do what you like.
I said why I believe. I wasn't under the impression that this thread was to offer "compelling reason" for others to believe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by mikehager, posted 06-01-2005 12:15 PM mikehager has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by mikehager, posted 06-02-2005 11:10 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 111 (214033)
06-03-2005 8:31 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Max Power
06-03-2005 12:10 PM


What about the possibility that Jesus was dillusional but at the same time very convincing.
What about comming back from the dead?
Now thats convincing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Max Power, posted 06-03-2005 12:10 PM Max Power has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by Hrun, posted 06-03-2005 8:36 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 41 by Max Power, posted 06-04-2005 10:51 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied
 Message 42 by ringo, posted 06-04-2005 11:08 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024