Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 66 (9049 total)
85 online now:
dwise1, jar, PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat), Stile (5 members, 80 visitors)
Newest Member: Wes johnson
Happy Birthday: Coragyps
Post Volume: Total: 887,687 Year: 5,333/14,102 Month: 254/677 Week: 59/54 Day: 2/10 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   What variety of creationist is Buzsaw? (Minnemooseus and Buzsaw only)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Message 58 of 84 (635466)
09-29-2011 11:58 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Buzsaw
09-28-2011 8:00 PM

Re: Co-ordinating Peanut Gallery With Debate
Thus the Exodus evidence becomes somewhat supportive to the Noaic flood and vise versa; the flood somewhat supportive to the Exodus.

Can you see that you are building a house of cards, here?

How can you two unsupported assertions be used to support each other?

King Arthur was real becuase of the Lady in the Lake and she is real because of King Arthur.

You really need to examine your thought procecess here, Buz.

Edited by Admin, : Hide good point made by a non-participant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Buzsaw, posted 09-28-2011 8:00 PM Buzsaw has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021