Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 46/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Biblical God Incompatible With Big Bang.
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2539 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 39 of 149 (379931)
01-25-2007 8:12 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Buzsaw
01-25-2007 7:59 PM


Re: the system of heavens
com'on buz, you know better than this.
For him to be eternal there has had to be eternal heavens for him to manage and live in.
There was no first thing in the universe, though all things came from him
this is a contradiction of your beliefs as I understand them. God occupies a separate space from himself, and he is that separate space?
Science has also discovered layers of our own heavens blanketing the earth
oh boy. you've assigned a purpose to a purposeless thing. the atmoshpere just "is". the separate layers are arbitrary. we defined what make them up. the only real difference is that each layer has less mass than the one below it, and gets colder the further up you go (the ionosphere being really wierd--it's the coldest in the normal sense, but each atom is quite hot). it wasn't designed for us. in fact, we don't even have our original atmosphere.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Buzsaw, posted 01-25-2007 7:59 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Buzsaw, posted 01-25-2007 9:36 PM kuresu has replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2539 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 48 of 149 (380245)
01-26-2007 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by Buzsaw
01-25-2007 9:36 PM


Re: the system of heavens
the only thing I'm going to say is about this:
That's why we IDists have a problem with dating methods which are based on our atmosphere as I understand them.
utterly wrong. The only radioactive dating I'm aware of that even has a thing to do with the atmosphere is C14-dating, and only because a main source of carbon is from carbon dioxide.
The layers inthe atmosphere don't have a purpose per se.
The reason they take on those characteristics has to deal with the mass of each layer, their temperature, and some other variables. tell me, does a solid have a purpose? or is it merely the result of "cold" atoms?
ABE:
I just realized that you might be mistaking "characteristics" for "purpose". most of what you listed as "purposes" of the layers are actually there characteristics. The other stuff (except for the religious junk in there) might be called "emergent properties". why does such a layer protect against UV rays? because of the ozone (O3, not O2) there. That's an emergent property. Not a purpose.
Edited by kuresu, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Buzsaw, posted 01-25-2007 9:36 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Buzsaw, posted 01-26-2007 8:47 PM kuresu has replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2539 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 51 of 149 (380261)
01-26-2007 8:53 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Buzsaw
01-26-2007 8:47 PM


Re: the system of heavens
buz, you oughta know by now that the weakest argument is that of incredulity. just because you can not imagine it so does not mean it is so.
the other main problem with your argument--you think the world was created for us (in the general sense, being life). It wasn't. It was just made. And not by purely random processes either.
secular science does not have much to explain (in terms of your objections, i would say). only your imagination is lacking.

Want to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Buzsaw, posted 01-26-2007 8:47 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Rob, posted 01-26-2007 9:43 PM kuresu has replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2539 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 55 of 149 (380277)
01-26-2007 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Rob
01-26-2007 9:43 PM


Re: the system of heavens
rob, i was asking him to use his imagination. that's not faith.
if I cannot imagine the existence of a God, does that mean he does not exist? of course not. just because you can't see how something works doesn't mean that it only works how you think it does.
if anything, I ask him to actually study up on science and see what it does say and how we know the things we know. i don't want him to take my word for it. granted, this requires effort on his (and your part), and something tells me you won't put any effort into this.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Rob, posted 01-26-2007 9:43 PM Rob has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Rob, posted 01-26-2007 10:57 PM kuresu has not replied
 Message 136 by Rob, posted 02-01-2007 11:34 AM kuresu has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2539 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 100 of 149 (380761)
01-28-2007 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by Buzsaw
01-27-2007 11:29 PM


Re: the system of heavens
hey buz, there ain't one massive magnetic field in the universe. once you leave the magnetic field of this planet, you have no more "north".
besides, which way is north in a 3-D world? we think of the earth's surface in terms of 2-D when it comes to directions. you travel left, right, forward, backwards (often referred to as up and down, but these are being used in a horizontal sense, not a vertical sense).
in space, you have freedom of movement in every direction. which one is north?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Buzsaw, posted 01-27-2007 11:29 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2539 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 104 of 149 (380773)
01-28-2007 7:32 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by Buzsaw
01-28-2007 6:56 PM


Re: the system of heavens
is your faith in god based on the holes that science has yet to explain?
come on, for an all-powerful god, he doesn't seem to have much power over where he gets put. if I were you, I'd let him be all-powerful and be the mover of what we call the natural world--not the king of the hole.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Buzsaw, posted 01-28-2007 6:56 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by Buzsaw, posted 01-28-2007 8:02 PM kuresu has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2539 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 110 of 149 (380811)
01-28-2007 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Greatest I am
01-28-2007 9:29 PM


Re: Many bb
Before you burst and start thinking up skiso jokes, please remember that most of the Bible was written by those who had most of their information conveyed to them while they were "in the spirit".
really? No wonder the bible is so screwed up. It was written by a bunch of mentally unstable people!
you know, arguing that "because someone else did x makes me okay" doesn't hold any water, period. in fact, as I just did, it can be turned against you quite readily and easily, making you look the fool.
since when did arguing that "before you acuse me of being wrong by murdering these thousands, Ida Amin did the same thing!" work?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Greatest I am, posted 01-28-2007 9:29 PM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by Greatest I am, posted 01-29-2007 9:14 AM kuresu has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024