Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,870 Year: 4,127/9,624 Month: 998/974 Week: 325/286 Day: 46/40 Hour: 1/4


EvC Forum ⇒ Social and Religious Issues ⇒ Faith and Belief ⇒

Would Evolutionists accept evidence for Creation?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Would Evolutionists accept evidence for Creation?
Percy
Member
Posts: 22502
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9

Normal Thread Display
Message 11 of 85 (446069)
01-04-2008 8:46 PM 		Reply to: Message 1 by Rahvin
01-03-2008 8:42 PM

Like you, I follow the evidence wherever it leads. I'm not an atheist, and my only "worldview" is "studying the evidence is how to figure things out." If the evidence says there was a global flood, then there was a global flood, which would be absolutely fantastic!
​
--Percy
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rahvin, posted 01-03-2008 8:42 PM Rahvin has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by tesla, posted 01-04-2008 8:51 PM Percy has not replied
  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22502
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9

Normal Thread Display
Message 25 of 85 (446209)
01-05-2008 7:24 AM 		Reply to: Message 17 by Chiroptera
01-04-2008 9:01 PM

Re: Adminnemooseus opinion is that this topic would best be "evolutionists only"
Chiroptera writes:
​
(I wouldn't mind it if Cold Foreign Object weren't allowed to shit over what might be an interesting conversation, though.)
​
Ditto tesla.
​
--Percy
This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Chiroptera, posted 01-04-2008 9:01 PM Chiroptera has not replied
  
Percy
Member
Posts: 22502
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 4.9

Normal Thread Display
Message 74 of 85 (456812)
02-20-2008 9:09 AM 		Reply to: Message 73 by ICANT
02-20-2008 7:55 AM

Re: Re-Flood
ICANT writes:
​
Paulk writes:
​
No, I'm not - as you should know if you have been following what I have said. I'm saying that it happened milliosn of years ago and that continental drift happens at speeds within an order of magnitude of those observed today. What did NOT happen is a far faster break-up in the last 5000 years or so - and THAT is what you are claiming.
​
So you are agreeing that Pangea did exist.
You are also agreeing that the continents were formed by that one land mass dividing.
​
By no rational chain of logic do your conclusions derive from anything PaulK said. It is just such obvious stupidities that cause people to ask whether you are a troll. Suggest more often putting your brain in gear before typing.
​
AbE: Whoops! Ignore this post completely. Somehow or other I read that as, "So you are agreeing that Pangea did *not* exist." Apologies, etc.
​
--Percy
​
Edited by Percy, : Add retraction.
​
Edited by Percy, : Spelling.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by ICANT, posted 02-20-2008 7:55 AM ICANT has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024