Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,427 Year: 3,684/9,624 Month: 555/974 Week: 168/276 Day: 8/34 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Would Evolutionists accept evidence for Creation?
onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 78 of 85 (457311)
02-22-2008 1:31 PM


Creationist always follow the same trend...
(1) First they deny such a thing is accurate...(Sun as the center, ever changing planet, descent with mods)
(2) Then they attack it...(trial of Galileo, witch hunts, Dover, PA)
(3) Finally they say, after much scientific work has been done, that it was in the Bible the WHOLE time they just didn't know how to read it yet.
Well you can thank science I guess for keeping these guys in the loop with their own faith however, they fail to make the correct connections with the time frames given by geologist.
My avatar is a picture of Pangea. Science says it was at one time.
Science says it separated into the continents we have today.
Genesis 1:9 says: "water gathered to one place rest called land."
Genesis 10:25 says: "earth was divided in Peleg's days."
Now you twist that any way you want too. It will still indicate the land was in one place and that the earth was divided (cleaved) in the days of Peleg.
The seperation of the Pangea 250 millions and a story about worlds dividing 5000 years ago do not correlate, you can make the assumption but, you're doing so after the facts of the Pangea were known. Before that it was just a story about something that literally happened 5000 years ago. Your connection between the two is a presumption ICANT.

All great truths begin as blasphemies

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024