Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mary in the Roman Catholic Church - intercession or idolatry?
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 108 of 132 (251915)
10-15-2005 3:57 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by Faith
10-10-2005 12:07 PM


Re: Mediatrix, mediums between Godhead,and mediocre conclusions
First of all, Catholic theology quite clearly states that Mary is only human. One only has to check the Catechism of the Catholic Church to see this.
Faith writes:
The same site points out that Mary's supposed "immaculate conception" and assumption into heaven HAVE been made official, neither of which has any scriptural justification, and both of which usurp qualities of Christ.
Actually, I do think the assumption of Mary can be seen in the Scriptures.
Besides that, does the Translation of Enoch or Elijah's rising in the whirlwind into heaven in anyway usurp Christ's qualities?
In case you haven't noticed, Assumption is a Catholic way of saying Translation.
edit: corrected spelling.
This message has been edited by Mr. Ex Nihilo, 10-15-2005 04:00 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Faith, posted 10-10-2005 12:07 PM Faith has not replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 109 of 132 (251916)
10-15-2005 4:05 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Faith
10-10-2005 11:40 AM


Re: Reformation Protestant point of view
Faith writes:
Only God can hear prayer.
Faith, you make an interesting point here.
Could you please pray for me so that I understand your position better?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Faith, posted 10-10-2005 11:40 AM Faith has not replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 110 of 132 (251917)
10-15-2005 4:08 AM


Related Topic:
Faith, when you read all the folk legends and religious writings of the flood in all the cultures around the ancient world, do you consider this evidence that there was indeed a world-wide flood in the past?

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 111 of 132 (251918)
10-15-2005 4:08 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by AdminPhat
10-12-2005 3:58 AM


Re: Focus on the Topic
oops...sorry.
I didn't see this message.
oh well...might as well slip this in.
According to Catholic doctrine Mary is like the Ark of the Covenant of the Christian faith. The Israelites didn't worship the Ark of the Covenant itself -- they worshipped that which resided within it.
Consequently, the Ark of the Covenant now resides in heaven according to the Book of Revelations.
And speaking of the Book of Revelations...
NIV writes:
He came and took the scroll from the right hand of him who sat on the throne. And when he had taken it, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb. Each one had a harp and they were holding golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints.
...isn't this taking place in heaven?
What are these people in heaven doing with these bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints?
Faith, I've found an article that I think expresses my Catholic beliefs very well. I'm not expecting anyone to accept this. However, at the time I find it irksome that some would make rather sweeping statements about my faith without really taking the time to understand my own perspective. For anyone confused by this issue, please read the following:
The Intercession of the Saints By Jason Evert writes:
1. Since the Bible says that contacting in the dead is the abominable sin of necromancy (Deut. 18:10-12), the intercession of the saints seems blasphemous to me.
This objection to the intercession of saints is an honorable and sincere one. It expresses a disposition that all Christians must have”refusing to do anything that takes away from the adoration that belongs only to God. When this objection is raised, you should affirm that if praying to saints takes away from one’s devotion to God, then it is a practice that should end at once. Expressing this to an evangelical Christian will help alleviate his presumption that you may not be as interested in serving God with single-heartedness.
When the Bible mentions necromancy, it condemns the practice of conjuring up the dead, as Saul did through the witch of Endor in 1 Samuel 28. When Jesus spoke with Moses....during the Transfiguration, this was not necromancy. When David asked the angels of heaven to bless the Lord, this also was not offensive to God (Ps.103:20-21). Likewise, when a Catholic asks St. Peter to pray for him, he is not conjuring up a spirit from Hades in order to acquire secret knowledge. After all, those in heaven are "like the angels," and are more alive than we are, since the Lord is "not God of the dead, but of the living" (Luke 20:36-38). So, if it does not offend God when a Catholic says "St. Peter, pray for me," we should all rejoice that God has given us the gift of Peter’s prayers.
2. But if you pray to the saints you are worshiping them.
Whenever discussing a doctrine, it is always effective to define your terms. "Pray" is an Old English word that means simply "to ask." In Protestant theology, the word has become synonymous with worship, but that is not the original use of the term.
Any time a Catholic utters a petition to a saint, it is taken for granted that it is a request for that saint to pray to God for them. For example, the "Hail Mary" contains the request, "pray for us sinners." If you ask a person to pray for you, it proves that you do not think that he is God. What needs to be stressed here is that none of our prayers terminate in the saints, as if they had the power in and of themselves to answer prayers.
3. If I had a problem at work, why would I take it to the volunteers in the mailroom if I were friends with the CEO himself? After all, doesn’t the Bible say that Jesus is our one mediator (1 Tim. 2:5)?
The flaw in this objection is that it proves too much. For if Catholics should not ask those in heaven for their prayers since we can go straight to Jesus, then no Christian on earth should ask a fellow believer for his prayers. When one believer asks another for his prayers, it is not because God is too distant or callous to listen to him. On the contrary, God is so generous he has given the body of Christ such unity that each member can pray for the others. This is a great gift, for "the prayer of a righteous man has great power in its effects" (Jas. 5:16), and the angels and saints in heaven are inarguably righteous.
Though the Bible tells us that we must go to God in our necessities, it also encourages us to ask for each other’s prayers. After all, salvation is a family affair. Can the eye say to the hand, "I need you not?" Neither should we say that we don’t need the prayers of the rest of the body of Christ (on earth or in heaven).
Immediately after requesting that we pray for each other in 1 Timothy 2:1-4, Paul affirms that Christ is the one mediator. Again, let us define our terms. A mediator is one who comes between two parties with the purpose of uniting them. Christ played a role of mediation that only the God-man could, but Christians are still called to serve as mediators between Christ and the world. In no way does this diminish the unique work of Christ. On the contrary, it manifests it.
For example, Christ is our only high priest, but we are all called to be a nation of priests (1 Pet. 2:9). Christ is the only Son of God, yet we are made sons of God through adoption (Gal. 3:4). The Christian life consists in being conformed to Christ, and as Paul says, being "God’s fellow-workers" (1 Cor. 3:9) in his plan of salvation.
4. Aren’t the saints in heaven busy worshiping God?
Sometimes when discussing doctrines, it is helpful to take a step back and look at the objection from a different angle. So invite the person you are speaking with to imagine a man who spent 80 years on earth serving the Lord and praying fervently for everyone in need. After passing away, he walked across the clouds to the Pearly Gates. St. Peter checked the book, his name was there, and he was ready to enter. As he walked through the gates, he noticed a poem on a large sign that read, "Welcome to the Father’s house; we hope you enjoy your stay. In heaven, you may worship God, but you’re not allowed to pray."
To think of those in heaven as unwilling or unable to pray for us is to have a grave misconception of heaven. It is not an isolated part of the body of Christ that exists without concern for the other members of the body who are still working out their salvation with fear and trembling (Phil. 2:12). Those in heaven surround us as a "great cloud of witnesses" (Heb. 12:1), and the book of Revelation teaches that the prayers they offer for us "saints" is an integral part of the eternal worship given to God.
John describes the heavenly worship in these terms: "The twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each holding a harp, and with golden bowls of incense, which are the prayers of the saints" (Rev. 5:8). The angels also play a role in bringing our prayers to God: "The smoke of the incense rose with the prayers of the saints from the hand of the angel before God" (Rev. 8:4). If intercession among members of the body of Christ on earth is "good and it is acceptable in the sight of God our Savior" (1 Tim. 2:1-4), how would such behavior not also be pleasing to God in heaven?
In the story of Lazarus and the rich man (Luke 16:19-31), the rich man shows concern for his family on earth, even though he is in hell. If a person in hell has such concern, and those in heaven are perfected in love and can finally pray with an undivided heart for the Church of God, how could they not be concerned about our salvation?
5. How can the saints hear our prayers?
Along with the concern about the "worshiping of saints" by praying to them, the question of their ability to hear us is among the most frequent of Protestant concerns. The book of Revelation is especially helpful in dealing with this, since it describes people in heaven who are aware of the happenings on earth (Rev. 6:11; 7:13-14). They have this capacity according to God’s designs and not of their own power. Paul alluded to this when he said, "Now I know in part; then I shall understand fully, even as I have been fully understood" (1 Cor. 13:12).
Those in heaven are part of the mystical body of Christ, and have not been separated from us by death. Christ is the vine, and we are the branches. So, if we are connected to him, we are inseparably bound together with them as well. Thus, the angels and saints stand before the throne of God, offer our prayers to him, and cheer us on as we run the good race.
If those in heaven are of no help to us, is it that they do not care, or does God forbid them to know of our toil and render them incapable of praying for us? Encourage the person you are speaking with to take this to prayer, asking the Father if this is truly his plan for the body of Christ.
6. There are one billion Catholics and 300 million Orthodox. If one in a hundred of these prayed a daily rosary, Mary would receive 689 million Hail Marys each day! So, even if she could hear the prayers, she’d have to be omniscient to comprehend them all. And where would she get the time?
Since Mary is in heaven, it is literally true that she does not have time to answer all the petitions”she has eternity. Time in the afterlife is not the same as it is here, and so this is not an insurmountable objection.
In regard to the number of petitions, if the number were infinite, then an omniscient mind would be required. So long as the number is finite, then the hearer requires a finite expansion of knowledge, which God could certainly grant to a glorified soul in heaven. While discussing this, you could point out that 50 people in an Internet chat room can communicate simultaneously from around the world. If modern technology can enable humans to do this, God is infinitely capable "by the power at work within us is able to do far more abundantly than all that we ask or think" (Eph. 3:20).
When concluding any conversation”especially one on the intercession of the saints”it is always good to promise to pray for each other. Not only will this benefit both of you in the realm of grace, it will remind your friend that the body of Christ is a great gift to draw us near to God.
Jason's article here fairly well sums up my point of view as well.
This message has been edited by Mr. Ex Nihilo, 10-15-2005 10:55 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by AdminPhat, posted 10-12-2005 3:58 AM AdminPhat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by Phat, posted 10-16-2005 6:41 AM Mr. Ex Nihilo has replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 116 of 132 (252031)
10-15-2005 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by macaroniandcheese
10-15-2005 3:45 PM


Re: a bit of clarification and edification.
brennakimi writes:
but there is undeniably a whole lot of extra-biblical mythology in the catholic church.
Could you show me in the Scriptures where it says the Scriptures are the only source for knowing about God?
Please don't misunderstand me. I'm not askng for Scriptures which authenticate the validity of their source. I'm simply asking for a passage of Scripture which actually specifically say that you can only trust the Scriptures themselves.
Also, could you please expand upon what the Catholic church teaches which you believe to be considered extra-biblical?
If you wish to respond and you consider this off-topic could you propose a new thread to discuss it further?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-15-2005 3:45 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-15-2005 6:29 PM Mr. Ex Nihilo has replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 119 of 132 (252042)
10-15-2005 6:58 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by macaroniandcheese
10-15-2005 6:29 PM


Re: a bit of clarification and edification.
brennakimi writes:
the catholic church is quite well known for it's mythologies.
While I admit that there are several saints that are now believed to have never existed -- I'm not sure sure what other mythologies you are refering to.
Could you elaborate please?
brennakimi writes:
frankly that was an irrelevant comment and i should strike it from the issue.
Ok. But if you change your mind and would like to discuss it further please let me know, ok?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-15-2005 6:29 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-16-2005 2:21 AM Mr. Ex Nihilo has replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 122 of 132 (252132)
10-16-2005 9:30 AM
Reply to: Message 120 by macaroniandcheese
10-16-2005 2:21 AM


Re: a bit of clarification and edification.
brennakimi writes:
well. to start, there's all the things about the heavenly wars that milton invented. note: a novelist, not a cleric.
But there is a strong, authentic tradition in both Catholicism and Protestantism which displays a war in heaven -- the Book of Revelations (aka: the Book of the Apocalypse).
The Book(s) of Enoch, although not considered part of the canon by many churches, also incorporates these kinds of ideas as well. Jude even quotes from one the books of Enoch as if it were divinely inspired.
brennakimi writes:
...there's the spear of destiny...
But that's fiction, isn't it? I don't think there's any official Catholic doctrine about the "spear of destiny".
brennakimi writes:
...the seven deadly sins...
The seven deadly sins seems the follow the Augustinian breakdown of the Ten Commandments. The Catholic church accepted Augustine's method, and Luther also continued in this tradition with one modification: he preferred to follow the word order of Exodus 20, and so his ninth commandment became a prohibition against coveting the house and his tenth prohibited coveting the wife, slaves, and animals.
brennakimi writes:
...the regions of hell from dante's inferno (again, novelist)...
Well, the Scriptures do indicate that there are different regions of heaven, such as the Third Heaven for example. Likewise, the Scriptures do seem to indicate different regions for the dead, the righteous dead and the dead which are dammed (aka: sheol).
These ideas preceded Dante's by around a thousand years.
brennakimi writes:
the idea that mary remained a virgin after christ's birth (despite the bible saying he had brothers and the blatant knowledge that jewish tradition at the time supported large families in order to fulfill god's promise of expanding the line).
Again, there is a strong tradition from the earliest Church fathers of this. Even Luther, Calvin and Zwingli never doubted the perpetual virginity of Mary. It's only fairly recently within the Protestant churches that we see the idea of Mary having other children becoming a noteworthy idea within some Christian churches.
Today most Protestants are unaware of these early beliefs regarding Mary’s virginity and the proper interpretation of "the brethren of the Lord." And yet, the Protestant Reformers themselves -” Martin Luther, John Calvin, and Ulrich Zwingli -” honored the perpetual virginity of Mary and recognized it as the teaching of the Scriptures, as have other, more modern Protestants.
Old Lutheran, High Anglican, and the Eastern Orthodox Churches all still hold the same opinions when it comes to Mary's perpetual virginity (and, like my own Catholic faith, the Eastern Orthodox can trace its roots back very far into Christian history).
Here's some more info...
What the Early Church Believed: The Perpetual Virginity of Mary | Catholic Answers
brennakimi writes:
i'd continue but i'm tired and (not being catholic) i'd have to ask someone else.
Hope I'm not boring you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-16-2005 2:21 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-16-2005 11:07 AM Mr. Ex Nihilo has replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 125 of 132 (252170)
10-16-2005 12:34 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by jar
10-16-2005 11:18 AM


Re: a bit of clarification and edification.
jar writes:
But it is in both 1 Enoch and in First Adam & Eve. Both of these were quite popular at the time of Jesus and infact Enoch is specifically quoted in several places in books among the common Canon.
That's what I was thinking too.
jar writes:
This Protestant knew about it. It was even featured in this Frontspiece from my Yearbook (Hint, it carries a banner and is located at the horses ass).
And, yet, oddly enough jar, this Catholic didn't know about it. Let me rephrase that: I knew about it from Hollywood -- but I've never read any Catholic writings which actually talk about this object. It doesn't appear to be part of any Catholic doctrine that I can think of either.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by jar, posted 10-16-2005 11:18 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by jar, posted 10-16-2005 12:40 PM Mr. Ex Nihilo has replied
 Message 128 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-16-2005 2:05 PM Mr. Ex Nihilo has not replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 127 of 132 (252174)
10-16-2005 12:50 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by macaroniandcheese
10-16-2005 11:07 AM


Re: a bit of clarification and edification.
brennakimi writes:
tell me where. old testament please. there's a whole lot of hell talk in the new that i see as having no basis. i don't trust inovation.
Well, for the record, it's not a Catholic innovation as far as I can tell.
Here's one perspective of the different levels of hell from a very Protestant perspective....
Reformed church thoughts about the different layers of hell as recorded in Hebrew Scriptures and carried over into the Christian Scriptures...
By the way, I don't necessarilly agree with everything mentioned in this link. However, I think there are some concepts here that Catholics would generally agree with when it comes to the definition of different layers in the more tormenting parts of the afterlife.
Mr. Ex Nihilo writes:
Again, there is a strong tradition from the earliest Church fathers of this. Even Luther, Calvin and Zwingli never doubted the perpetual virginity of Mary. It's only fairly recently within the Protestant churches that we see the idea of Mary having other children becoming a noteworthy idea within some Christian churches.
brennakimi writes:
i just don't see whay it's important that she remain a virgin. but then i also don't see why people worship purity.
The site I had linked before discussed some reasons why some believe that it was important that she remain that way. But I'm not trying to convince you that the Catholic faith is the correct faith. I'm just trying to display that this belief does indeed carry over into other Christian denominations. If you want to call it a myth, that's fine with me. But it doesn't appear strictly within the Catholic faith. Many others hold to this view too -- and they believe it can be traced right back to the time of Christ.
Mr. Ex Nihilo writes:
Hope I'm not boring you.
brennakimi writes:
i just wonder why you're asking me.
I suppose I found some of your assertions confusing. Even back when I was a conservative Lutheran (which, at least in some senses, was very anti-Catholic), I didn't hold some of the views you're expressing here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-16-2005 11:07 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 130 of 132 (252209)
10-16-2005 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by jar
10-16-2005 12:40 PM


Re: a bit of clarification and edification.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by jar, posted 10-16-2005 12:40 PM jar has not replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 131 of 132 (252211)
10-16-2005 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by Trixie
10-16-2005 2:35 PM


Re: Focus on the Topic
I think it's more of an object which is reputed by those within certain occultic circles to grant "special powers" -- the spear that the Roman soldier used to pierce the side of our Lord. Hitler might have looked for it -- or it might have been a movie about Hitler looking for it. I can't remember for sure now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by Trixie, posted 10-16-2005 2:35 PM Trixie has not replied

  
Mr. Ex Nihilo
Member (Idle past 1363 days)
Posts: 712
Joined: 04-12-2005


Message 132 of 132 (252314)
10-17-2005 12:54 AM
Reply to: Message 121 by Phat
10-16-2005 6:41 AM


Re: Focus on the Topic
oh..ok...
sorry.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Phat, posted 10-16-2005 6:41 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024