Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mormon Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 8 of 264 (49412)
08-08-2003 2:33 PM


The thing I find most objectionable about Mormonism is the prohibition against masturbation.
Other than that Mormonism seems mostly to be about community and family bonds, which I can respect.

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Agent Uranium [GPC], posted 08-08-2003 2:38 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 26 by nator, posted 08-08-2003 7:31 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 11 of 264 (49418)
08-08-2003 2:44 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Trump won
08-08-2003 2:42 PM


They made their own book.
Oh, you mean like how Protestants use a different bible than the Catholics?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Trump won, posted 08-08-2003 2:42 PM Trump won has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 15 of 264 (49439)
08-08-2003 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Yaro
08-08-2003 3:04 PM


Also, read up on Joseph Smith, and the actual history of the Mormon church, which was a pretty violent one in the early US.
Yeah, but that was pretty much the result of heavy, violent intolerance against the Mormons.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Yaro, posted 08-08-2003 3:04 PM Yaro has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Yaro, posted 08-08-2003 3:37 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 16 of 264 (49440)
08-08-2003 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Trump won
08-08-2003 3:14 PM


The catholics added books to the bible.
Well, that hardly makes sense, considering that Catholics came before Protestants. If anything, it was the Protestants taking out books from the Bible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Trump won, posted 08-08-2003 3:14 PM Trump won has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 18 of 264 (49449)
08-08-2003 4:29 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Yaro
08-08-2003 3:37 PM


Yeah, I'd heard about that attack. Honestly I don't mean to say that the Mormons have any less blood on their hands than any other group. In this particular case I fear it was the result of a siege mentality fostered on the Mormons by their continual oppression at the hands of other groups.
But certainly they haven't always played nice.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Yaro, posted 08-08-2003 3:37 PM Yaro has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Trump won, posted 08-08-2003 4:52 PM crashfrog has replied
 Message 20 by A_Christian, posted 08-08-2003 4:55 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 21 of 264 (49463)
08-08-2003 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Trump won
08-08-2003 4:52 PM


Luther split from the church and put it back the way it was supposed to be.
Sure, the way he thought it was supposed to be. Obviously the Catholics thought different. And I don't recall Luther traveling to the middle east to do any digs. So he was clearly basing his opinion on the same information avaliable to the Catholics.
How do you determine who was right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Trump won, posted 08-08-2003 4:52 PM Trump won has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Rrhain, posted 08-08-2003 9:15 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 22 of 264 (49465)
08-08-2003 5:25 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by A_Christian
08-08-2003 4:55 PM


A "religion" based on family sounds nice, until you understand the
the "Family" take first place. As the Mr. Osmond (Osmond Brothers)
once said----"Family first, then the Church, and then Career."
Yeah? So? I'm not hearing the downside, here.
Additionally, the Salvation Story is not harmed in anyway by their
exclusion. As for the other books---there is very little difference
in translations, so this whole train of attack is of no merit.
I'm just saying that you can hardly condemn a church for altering the bible if your own faith has done exactly the same thing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by A_Christian, posted 08-08-2003 4:55 PM A_Christian has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 25 of 264 (49470)
08-08-2003 6:30 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by A_Christian
08-08-2003 6:27 PM


The lands
discribed and the people found there and the cities lived in
are still there for ALL to see.
Well, sure. But all the places mentioned in Watership Down are there for you to see, but is it your position that rabbits can talk?
Denmark exists, but Hamlet didn't really happen. Verona exists but Romeo and Juliet is made-up. What does the reality of the setting have to do with the veracity of the events?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by A_Christian, posted 08-08-2003 6:27 PM A_Christian has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 36 of 264 (49695)
08-10-2003 12:31 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by Trump won
08-10-2003 12:27 AM


I have a english to hebrew dictionary and next to paradise it says eden
So? The question isn't what the word means now, it's what it meant when Jesus said it then. Or didn't you know that words change over time?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Trump won, posted 08-10-2003 12:27 AM Trump won has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 49 of 264 (51412)
08-20-2003 5:49 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by A_Christian
08-20-2003 11:19 AM


They
also believe Jesus and Satan (Good vs. Bad) are brothers.
Hrm, that really puts some of the works of Orson Scott Card (noted s-f author and Mormon) into perspective... it really explains some of his characterization choices.
Just an aside.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by A_Christian, posted 08-20-2003 11:19 AM A_Christian has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 57 of 264 (64001)
11-02-2003 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by theOtter
11-02-2003 4:32 PM


How do you know who the decendants of Cain are?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by theOtter, posted 11-02-2003 4:32 PM theOtter has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 65 of 264 (64158)
11-03-2003 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by theOtter
11-03-2003 6:44 AM


Before the revelation of 1978, this including determininghopefully through revelationdescendancy from Cain.
So what you're saying is, they just pick who is "decended from Cain", that is, who doesn't get to be a priest, based on "revelation", which could just simply be "who don't they like." No surprise that it turns out to be mostly black people who are decended from Cain.
I mean how would you determine the difference between somebody who was deciding who was decended from Cain based on actual revelation from God; and who was just deciding based on who they did and didn't like? Do you just trust god not to let that happen?
This looks like just a big, involved justification for institutionalized racism. It's like spiritual racial profiling.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by theOtter, posted 11-03-2003 6:44 AM theOtter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by theOtter, posted 11-03-2003 12:31 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 68 of 264 (64164)
11-03-2003 12:35 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by theOtter
11-03-2003 12:31 PM


The same way that person should be deciding: through revelation.
Well, you haven't really solved the problem. You've just passed it on, because you still have the same problem: how do you tell the difference between revelation and lying?
How can you even tell the difference between genuine revelation and lying to yourself? After all racists aren't racist because they wake up one day and say "hey, I'm going to start trating black folks like crap." They do what they do because, at a deep level, it just feels right to them to do so.
You can call it "revelation". I call it "acting on your pre-existing predjudices." I ask you how it could ever be possible to tell the difference. This is a problem of all religions, of course, and not just the LDS. (What would you prefer as the proper address for your faith? Mormonism? MC of JC of LDS?)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by theOtter, posted 11-03-2003 12:31 PM theOtter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by theOtter, posted 11-03-2003 1:05 PM crashfrog has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 75 of 264 (64356)
11-04-2003 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by theOtter
11-03-2003 1:05 PM


So where does Mormon come into all this? Well, frankly, nowhere. Mormon was a prophet who lived ca. A.D. 310-385.
Thanks, I was wondering.
that’s not something I can answer for you.
Well, I'll accept that you can tell the difference in yourself - or that you think you can, anyway.
The more important question is, how do you tell the difference in other people? Like, the ones who are setting doctrine or policy or even writing the Scriptures themselves? If you can't explain how you yourself do it, how can you trust that anybody else is able to?
How would I explain what salty is like? I would take a random sample of foods, and have randomly chosen people taste them and identify the salty things. I would test many people with the same foods and see to what extent they agreed.
Now, maybe I don't wind up knowing exactly what saltiness is "like". I do however wind up with a pretty good sense of what is salty, and what's not, and that's far more important.
there’s nothing I can say that will change your mind.
Yeah, pretty much. The words that would change my mind would have to be uttered from God's own lips.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by theOtter, posted 11-03-2003 1:05 PM theOtter has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 76 of 264 (64357)
11-04-2003 9:51 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by theOtter
11-03-2003 4:35 PM


Yes, the mark of Cain was a skin of blackness. We’ve firmly established that.
That's not even close to Biblical, just so you know. The mark is on his forehead, not his entire skin.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by theOtter, posted 11-03-2003 4:35 PM theOtter has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Buzsaw, posted 11-04-2003 10:44 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024