Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,455 Year: 3,712/9,624 Month: 583/974 Week: 196/276 Day: 36/34 Hour: 2/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creation Vs. Evolution = Free will Vs. determinism
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 10 of 164 (127212)
07-24-2004 12:02 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Wounded King
07-23-2004 4:45 PM


Hi WK,
I was thinking about this today on the lifeguard stand, but more from the theological perspective.
In our universe, we take probability or chance for granted. If you can, imagine a universe where EVERYthing happens for a specific knowable reason. Suppose you lived in this universe. How would you know the difference between your choices and the anti-chance events of the universe? If EVERYthing happened for a specific reason (non-chance), there would be no differentiation between your will and the will of whoever was subjecting the universe to determined actions.
In our universe it seems as though the ONLY thing not subject to chance is our free-will. I mean we might as well roll the dice to see who wins the presidential election if free-will was the same as chance. Nations rise and fall. People mature. Some make good choices some make bad. Crime rates rise and fall. Some people from good homes turn bad, people rise from ashes to be great. There are uneven distributions in percentages of those who abide by a certain religion. Etc...
People are influenced yes, but only to a certain extent by those around them and by their circumstances.
Now if God is in control of everything, and God wants to give us a small amount of sovereignty in order to have meaningful free-will, the only way he can truly give us uncoerced free-will is to create a background of randomness and chance so that our free-will will stand apart. Chance exists to differentiate our will from God's. God is still very much in control of chance, but has hidden his will in chance so as not to coerce our own.
I don't know what bearing this has on QM. But it seems like we may have found absolute randomness and absolute order in QM. Random in the sense of unpredictablity and order in the sense that every particle seems to 'know' where every other particle is.
It's all mind bending stuff. If I think about it much more, I might go nuts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Wounded King, posted 07-23-2004 4:45 PM Wounded King has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Wounded King, posted 07-24-2004 4:54 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 14 of 164 (127402)
07-25-2004 1:28 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Wounded King
07-24-2004 4:54 AM


Thank you for your reply.
What is your opinion of fore-ordination? Do you believe that God knows everything that will happen in the future,
yes.
can God be surprised?
Nope. Time is a constraint of the physical universe, which God himself created. I see no reason why God would be time-bound and therefore be limited in knowledge by time. God is omniscient meaning he knows all the knowable simultaneously.
Do you agree with Syamsu that the sort of random factor God has used to allow us free will is similar to the apparently causeless, in purely material terms, creation of the universe?
Hmm... well, if randomness is a created element of the universe meant to make free-will meaningful, then randomness could not exist "before" the creation of the universe. However, there really wasn't a "before" was there, since time is a property of the universe? So if randomness came with the creation we couldn't really describe the creation itself as random. It's so hard to get away from time.
So I guess the answer is no.
This message has been edited by Hangdawg13, 07-25-2004 12:31 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Wounded King, posted 07-24-2004 4:54 AM Wounded King has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Wounded King, posted 07-25-2004 3:31 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 20 of 164 (127561)
07-25-2004 9:38 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Wounded King
07-25-2004 3:31 AM


I wasn't saying that creation itself was random but that the underlying basis of any randomness in the universe comes from a similar non-material source as whatever the primary cause was, i.e. God. In fact I personally am saying no such thing, but that was the argument I was putting up.
Oh, I see.
Yes, I think God keeps all laws and elements of the universe including randomness functioning accordingly. God has the power to tell all laws to stop or change, which would essentially destroy the current universe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Wounded King, posted 07-25-2004 3:31 AM Wounded King has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 21 of 164 (127562)
07-25-2004 9:44 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by jar
07-25-2004 9:13 AM


I can think of no better description of Hell than perfect foreknowledge.
But this is a human estimation of the situation. You cannot possibly fathom omniscience. Omniscience means that God knows fully every range of experiences that we go through, so he knows what his creations feel to the nth degree.
IMHO, one of the strongest arguments for Theistic Evolution is that GOD would be bored to death if he knew exactly what would happen. Any such existence would be misery for God and totally futile for man.
I too think God has an adventurous spirit, but this is an approximation. I think the greatest evidence that God is adventurous is that God provided created beings with the free-will to either choose for him or against him.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by jar, posted 07-25-2004 9:13 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by entwine, posted 07-26-2004 8:33 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 29 of 164 (127991)
07-27-2004 3:10 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by entwine
07-26-2004 8:33 AM


And you can?
Of course not. Jar implied that he knew what omniscience would be like, by relating it to his own experience. If you can imagine what it would be like to completely remove time and space from the bounds of your thinking, you might begin to grasp the tip of what omniscience is like. People often fantasize about if they were no longer bound by gravity and could fly around. I can only suppose removal of more boundaries would be even more awesome.
I mean, knowing everything at once is not an accurate description. Knowing everything before it happens or after it happens is not an accurate description either, because these are time words. Removing time from our thinking is pretty dang hard to do, but if God is imminent and transcendent, omniscient and omnipresent, then we have to remove the boundaries of time from our thinking, to get the first inkling of an understanding of his perception of things, if perception is even an applicable word.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by entwine, posted 07-26-2004 8:33 AM entwine has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Glordag, posted 07-27-2004 10:50 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied
 Message 47 by entwine, posted 08-06-2004 5:29 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 96 of 164 (134732)
08-17-2004 3:59 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by 1.61803
08-17-2004 2:31 PM


Re: The duality of reality
Why can't indeterminism and determinism not share reality?
My thoughts exactly!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by 1.61803, posted 08-17-2004 2:31 PM 1.61803 has not replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 104 of 164 (135111)
08-18-2004 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 103 by 1.61803
08-18-2004 4:06 PM


Re: The duality of reality
I know your argument will most likely critique the fact that events leading up to my decision will influence the CHOICE, and therefore it is only a illusion of freewill. But I say Poppycock, thoughts are not actions. It takes the next step to make thoughts manifest into actions. A choice.
So is it not possible that every atom and molecule that forms your body and brain was put together in such a fashion and set in motion in such a manner that that choice was predetermined? I sure hope not. Or can you have it both ways?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by 1.61803, posted 08-18-2004 4:06 PM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by 1.61803, posted 08-19-2004 12:37 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 106 of 164 (135140)
08-19-2004 1:21 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by 1.61803
08-19-2004 12:37 AM


Re: The duality of reality
Thank you for your reply.
I would tend to agree with you, but the question I'm raising is: are our very choices the result of a previous cause...
Kinda like chaos theory I guess... There are a finite number of variables involved in the weather, so theoretically, if you had a big enough fast enough computer that could somehow carry all values out to an infinite number of significant digits, you could know what the weather would do from now till doomsday... Such calculations are beyond our capabilities and knowledge, but that doesn't mean the weather is "destined" to follow a certain pattern from now till doomsday.
So as far as our brains go, could all of the incredible (but not infinite) numbers of variables that go into producing a single choice all be affected by cause and affect in the same way so that every thought is just an eventual effect of the first cause of the universe?
Maybe you understood what I was saying before, but I felt like I should restate it anyways.
It is true that all that exist unfolds from cause and effect, but I believe there is a property to reality that is not carved in stone.
And so do I. This would be the spiritual realm of reality perhaps?
But given the choice I choose the former.
lol

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by 1.61803, posted 08-19-2004 12:37 AM 1.61803 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by 1.61803, posted 08-19-2004 11:47 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 147 of 164 (135771)
08-20-2004 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by 1.61803
08-19-2004 11:47 PM


Re: The duality of reality
Knowing all possible outcomes is not the samething as knowing THE actual outcome. Whos to say that the randomness of the quantum world does not leak into the macro world?
Good points... All I can say is that I am confident I don't know...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by 1.61803, posted 08-19-2004 11:47 PM 1.61803 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Syamsu, posted 08-21-2004 5:14 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

  
Hangdawg13
Member (Idle past 773 days)
Posts: 1189
From: Texas
Joined: 05-30-2004


Message 154 of 164 (136042)
08-22-2004 12:16 AM
Reply to: Message 149 by Syamsu
08-21-2004 5:14 AM


Re: The duality of reality
But your confidence is unbalanced. You now have every confidence in cause and effect being true to fact, and no confidence in chance and outcome being true to fact. Surely you're not confident of chance and outcome in the context of extremist philosphical absolutism, but are confident of it being true to fact in every day life, aren't you?
I said, I'm confident I DON'T KNOW... IOW I'm not confident in anything except my own ignorance. I THINK randomness and determinism probably exist at once.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by Syamsu, posted 08-21-2004 5:14 AM Syamsu has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024