Hi, Robinrohan!
I edited your first post to highlight the point that you are making about ER and PR. I am not quite clear on some of this. Lets throw a few word definitions around and clarify our discussion, OK?
1) Does ER mean that religion is a philosophy of early man that is studied by us? Is our study based on our own educated relativism?
robinrohan writes:
ER is the accurate version, but this is not saying that someone who embraces PR is not authentically religious, and it is also not to say that someone who purportedly embraces ER IS authentically religious. It depends on the individual.
You seem to assert that education defines accuracy. This is true in most cases, but it depends on the definition of truth and on the belief that an individual has in God as a person and the weight of this source of knowledge apart from human wisdom.
Based on Websters, the very term "religion" is a relative construct.
Websters writes:
religion \ri-li-jen\ n 1 : the service and worship of God or the supernatural 2 : devotion to a religious faith 3 : a personal set or institutionalized system of religious beliefs, attitudes, and practices 4 : a cause, principle, or belief held to with faith and ardor religionist n
2) Define what you see as the definition of PR?
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 01-09-2005 02:59 AM