Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9073 total)
83 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, nwr (3 members, 80 visitors)
Newest Member: MidwestPaul
Post Volume: Total: 893,327 Year: 4,439/6,534 Month: 653/900 Week: 177/182 Day: 10/47 Hour: 0/2

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   former speed of light
simple 
Inactive Suspended Member


Message 226 of 230 (123649)
07-10-2004 4:21 PM
Reply to: Message 221 by Melchior
07-10-2004 10:18 AM


signs in the stars
quote:
Probably not, because the supernova must have spread it's light before the actual split.

Sounds like it must be. After all light from one thing, like a star could not travel faster than another. Certainly not with our light anyhow.
Must be quite a show, looking uo and seeing something like a supernova! According to my calculations, we are at the verge of the greatest cosmic light show in history, by 1000 fold! "Signs in the heavens" and "And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind. "(rev 6:13) "and the third part of the sun was smitten, and the third part of the moon, and the third part of the stars; so as the third part of them was darkened, and the day shone not for a third part of it, and the night likewise" Rev 8:12)"For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine. "(Is 13:10)
"And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; " (lu 21:25)

quote:
I'm going to ask you to think over what you think physical mean. Going by this quote, you don't really seem to be completely sure.

I looked at a site where a scientist answered a question on light. In his answer, he was pointing out that light was not physical. Myself, I don't really know enough about light to say. But the light we have in our physical world can be seen, and exist here. It has a speed, and properties, etc. So I see it as physical enough to exist in a physical universe, at least!
Why?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 221 by Melchior, posted 07-10-2004 10:18 AM Melchior has taken no action

Replies to this message:
 Message 227 by fnord, posted 07-10-2004 5:44 PM simple has replied

  
fnord
Inactive Member


Message 227 of 230 (123661)
07-10-2004 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 226 by simple
07-10-2004 4:21 PM


Re: signs in the stars
Myself, I don't really know enough about light to say

Really? You could have fooled me!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by simple, posted 07-10-2004 4:21 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 228 by simple, posted 07-10-2004 7:11 PM fnord has replied

  
simple 
Inactive Suspended Member


Message 228 of 230 (123672)
07-10-2004 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 227 by fnord
07-10-2004 5:44 PM


Re: signs in the stars
quote:
Really? You could have fooled me!

Perhaps if you stated something about it, you might have a chance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 227 by fnord, posted 07-10-2004 5:44 PM fnord has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 229 by fnord, posted 07-11-2004 3:40 AM simple has replied

  
fnord
Inactive Member


Message 229 of 230 (123698)
07-11-2004 3:40 AM
Reply to: Message 228 by simple
07-10-2004 7:11 PM


Re: signs in the stars
Arkie,

Do you actually read any posts by others, or for that matter your own? Judging by your reply you haven't read #227.


Thank God I'm an atheist -- Luis Buñuel

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by simple, posted 07-10-2004 7:11 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 230 by simple, posted 07-11-2004 9:33 PM fnord has taken no action

  
simple 
Inactive Suspended Member


Message 230 of 230 (123825)
07-11-2004 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 229 by fnord
07-11-2004 3:40 AM


Re: signs in the stars
Sorry, I guess even though it was short, I must have misunderstood. I guess it wasn't the sarcasm I took it for. Being in a minority opinion here I get into a defensive mode.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by fnord, posted 07-11-2004 3:40 AM fnord has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022