Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 78 (9007 total)
77 online now:
AZPaul3, driewerf, dwise1, Hyroglyphx, PaulK, Phat (AdminPhat) (6 members, 71 visitors)
Newest Member: Funkaloydb
Post Volume: Total: 881,313 Year: 13,061/23,288 Month: 786/1,527 Week: 87/138 Day: 11/25 Hour: 0/1

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Who can be saved? A Christian perspective
Inactive Member

Message 171 of 466 (150537)
10-17-2004 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by mike the wiz
10-17-2004 5:16 PM

Hi mike the wiz,

The point is that, statistically, it appears that we live in an indifferent universe.

The secularist, then, reasons that this is probably because we do live in an indifferent universe.

The apologist's claim is that we can't presume to know how God would do things.

And though either position could conceivably be so, the former is a logical progression based on the observable facts, and the latter is an ad hoc rationalization.

IOW, the first position is a one-to-one correspondence; whereas, the second (apologist) position must (circularly) assume that out of all the options/choices available to God, it just conveniently happens that he acts in such a way that it appears that we live in an indifferent universe.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by mike the wiz, posted 10-17-2004 5:16 PM mike the wiz has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by mike the wiz, posted 10-17-2004 7:08 PM Amlodhi has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020