Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,432 Year: 3,689/9,624 Month: 560/974 Week: 173/276 Day: 13/34 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Who can be saved? A Christian perspective
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 27 of 466 (146931)
10-03-2004 4:17 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by jar
09-11-2004 5:29 PM


Jesus Saves...Moses Invests
jar writes:
IMHO, as a Christian, anyone can be saved whether or not they acknowledge or profess a belief in Jesus or even GOD. In fact, even if they deny the existence of GOD they can and will likely be saved.
I agree with the first part of your premise, jar. Anyone who has never had a belief will get the chance to do so. I DO NOT agree that anyone who denies the existance of God will be saved,however. Let me clarify: Once God has made Himself known to someone, they best not deny Him. They may have denied Him prior to this event, however.
Wiz writes:
I think that what Christ says and has said is what counts. Who is saved and who is not; I will judge not, for all will stand before the judgement seat of Christ, including me.
As usual, Mike gives a Christian response...which I agree with.(being a Christian)
We believe in the Bible, yet we will not presume to judge anyone elses salvation.
ramoss writes:
From an athiestic point of view, it is a load of superstion , based on belief in an imaginary friend.
One question: From your atheist perspective, do souls and humans merely cease to exist? No trace of a lifetime charcter or soul...except though the bloody kids??!!
Ifen writes:
"saved" means this resurrection body with an earth memory, personality, and skills will live in heaven and never die and sing praise or something for an infinite span of time?
I tend to agree with this prognosis more.
jar writes:
Well, actually, Jesus said in no uncertain terms that there were two commandments, and that all the Laws and Prophecy hang on those two commandments.
and this contrasts with your first quote, (anyone can be saved whether or not they acknowledge or profess a belief in Jesus or even GOD.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by jar, posted 09-11-2004 5:29 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by jar, posted 10-03-2004 9:58 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 30 of 466 (147005)
10-03-2004 2:41 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by jar
10-03-2004 10:07 AM


Jar unplugged
So what you are essentially saying is that a guy could be an atheist and yet because he professed a love for "the least of these" with essentially all his heart,soul, mind, and strength--he would be saved. Right?
Because he is doing for the least of these, he is doing for God...
I won't dispute scripture, but I must point out that in Matthew, Jesus is addressing His Disciples..which are Jews, and that He is speaking of the time of His Second Coming. Many, though not ALL believe that before the Second Coming, the Church will have been taken out beforehand. The rest of the world...unbelievers...and the Jews will be left.
In context, Jesus is speaking of the standards by which God will judge those who are not traditional Christians.
In other words, I guess that you are right, jar and I see your point.
My point was that anyone who has already seen and or known Jesus
such as you or I--cannot then deny Him and go off doing good works being a skeptic but loving humanity.
If the Bible is true in all regards, the word says that those who have received a Disciple will have received Jesus, and by receiving Jesus they will receive God.
I'm with Mike in that we cannot judge who is and is not saved.
Say I grew up in Calcutta. Having never had a Baptist (or any other)
Preacher bang on my door, I know little of the Christian message except through the examples of people whom I know to be Christians..
Ideally, these Christians will be doing well for the least of these around me...and by example I see the love of God. Lets say, however, that I did not even know any Christians. Driven by a deep unction in my soul, I instinctively helped those around me who were less fortunate. (Matthew 25)
--The one point that I disagree with you is is that I could not ever deny God..or Christ...since I had never MET them to begin with.(Either directly,through communion/salvation experience or indirectly through another Christian.
You said that EVEN if I DID deny them I would be saved just by doing the good works.
Seeing as how you were brought up Catholic while I am Protestant, I can understand the "good works" interpretation.
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by jar, posted 10-03-2004 10:07 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by jar, posted 10-03-2004 3:41 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 32 of 466 (147028)
10-03-2004 4:04 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by jar
10-03-2004 3:41 PM


Minnesota Phats and Jar Jar Blinks
jar writes:
I don't know where you got the idea I was brought up a Catholic. I wasn't. Protestant all the way.
Sorry. I don't know where I picked it up, either.
jar writes:
I have to ask you a couple questions though. First, do you think GOD is superior to humans?
Yes. Do you think that human wisdom is our only reliable source? Belief in God, abstract though it may seem, qualifies as a concrete source of wisdom apart from human derived.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by jar, posted 10-03-2004 3:41 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by jar, posted 10-03-2004 4:06 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 34 of 466 (147054)
10-03-2004 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by jar
10-03-2004 4:06 PM


Re: Minnesota Phats and Jar Jar Blinks
No. There is a measureable difference between a man and a monkey or even a dolphin. There is an infinite difference between a man and God.
If Humanity= 10, Divinity= --->Infinity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by jar, posted 10-03-2004 4:06 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by jar, posted 10-03-2004 9:52 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 36 of 466 (147109)
10-04-2004 2:46 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by jar
10-03-2004 9:52 PM


Re: Minnesota Phats and Jar Jar Blinks
(I know that you are setting me up, but...) Yes...much greater.
Again, infinitely greater. Greater than the difference between a human and an amoeba.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by jar, posted 10-03-2004 9:52 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by jar, posted 10-04-2004 10:39 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 38 of 466 (147176)
10-04-2004 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by jar
10-04-2004 10:39 AM


Re: Minnesota Phats and Jar Jar Blinks
jar writes:
I happen to believe that GOD created the universe, has an inate understanding of the actual relattionship between gravity and all the other forces. Would you say that is accurate?
Yes. God understands the known and unknown Laws of the Universe. He can even transcend them in theory,(miracles,supernatural manifestations) yet does not choose to do so in general. He operates within the context of what we know as reality. He understands our limited knowledge and the vast gulf that seperates our understanding. He is not interested in "showing off" to us. His desire is that we recognize our need for Him. He desires our love and worship NOT for His own Ego, but for our own good.
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 10-04-2004 11:08 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by jar, posted 10-04-2004 10:39 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by jar, posted 10-04-2004 6:15 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 59 of 466 (147368)
10-05-2004 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by jar
10-04-2004 6:15 PM


Re: Minnesota Phats and Jar Jar Blinks
jar writes:
Okay, so we have a being that is far greater from us than we are from an amoeba, that created the whole universe, that inately understands all of the rules that govern this universe and in all of its complexity. ...I simply cannot believe that any such being would condemn folks to hell simply because they denied he existed.
Good point, and I almost agree. God never sends people to Hell, however. People send themselves there by denying God and following a whim or an idea that they conceive to be better. God gives numerous chances for repentance all through the Bible. I would imagine that He has made it very possible (though not easy) for us to avoid conscious denial of Him. By the way, Mike, the BCP which jar described I looked up. Is it this?
The Book of Common Prayer is one of the major works of English literature. Since its introduction in the mid-1500's it has exerted enormous influence on the religious and literary lives of all who speak the English language. The Book of Common Prayer has gone through a number of editions, not only in England where it originated, but in all the places where the various Churches of the Anglican communion are now active.
Jar, I suppose that the Anglicans had a cool prayer book, but do prayer books count as canonical?
Maybe I better back away from THAT discussion, however...or we will be arguing over what, if anything IS Canonical!
I am editing as you are posting, jar. In answer to your next post I agree with you in that God is SO much greater than us and since, after all, He knows how human nature is, He WILL probably overlook a lot of what we do, say, think, and believe. Doers this absolve those of us who know better, however? We know that we are drawn to love Jesus and His Father with ALL of what we can muster!
To those who do not yet feel this way, perhaps God will forgive them anyway. Maybe a "Get out of Hell, Free" card?
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 10-05-2004 12:03 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by jar, posted 10-04-2004 6:15 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by jar, posted 10-05-2004 12:56 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 61 of 466 (147373)
10-05-2004 1:05 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by jar
10-05-2004 12:56 AM


Re: Minnesota Phats and Jar Jar Blinks
I answered you above, (editing while you replied) but one more point. There is an intelligence in humans that leads to possible accountability...whereas an amoeba...with very limited intelligence, has very little accountability. I guess the next question is this: Who sets the standard for responsibility and accountability? If God expected nothing out of us, it would be His call...but Does He expect anything from us?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by jar, posted 10-05-2004 12:56 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by jar, posted 10-05-2004 1:07 AM Phat has replied
 Message 63 by jar, posted 10-05-2004 1:20 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 66 of 466 (147406)
10-05-2004 4:13 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by jar
10-05-2004 2:05 AM


Speaking of Love and forgiveness...
You are being too harsh on judging all of these guys..
does anyone believe they are more than swine and whale spit?
Yes. They are fallen Christians in need of forgiveness. I don't think that ALL of them have come to total repentance yet, but Jim Bakker, for one, started over in soup kitchens and his son is a great street evangelist working with skaters and taggers http://www.jimbakkershow.com/show.html Why do we get so angry when a preacher falls, especially when it involves money, yet we are SO forgiving to the C.E.O. bigwigs and their 100 million dollar thefts which cause thousands to lose their health insurance? I know that Swaggert got got twice, and I am doubtful if he is even repentent now...but can I judge him? The thousands who were duped by these T.V. swindlers are as much as fault themselves for being naive enough to fall for the lie. This does not mean that all media preachers are bad....some of them are very good...such as Charles Stanley and Michael Yousef. Chuck Swindoll is a good radio preacher as is Raul Reese from California. Bakker is forgiven by most of the people whom he misled...lets show some forgiveness and love, Jar Jar!
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 10-05-2004 03:37 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by jar, posted 10-05-2004 2:05 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by jar, posted 10-05-2004 10:33 AM Phat has replied
 Message 79 by nator, posted 10-07-2004 8:39 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 73 of 466 (147474)
10-05-2004 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 67 by jar
10-05-2004 10:33 AM


Re: Speaking of Love and forgiveness...
jar writes:
So you believe that GOD might be able to forgive people like Swindoll, Bakker, Falwell, Scott, and the rest of the liars, bigots, and crooks?
Careful, jar. Swindoll is well respected...watch who you put on your list.
If that is the case, if GOD can forgive such really, really horrible people, why would anyone think for even a second that GOD would not embrace and rejoice in your typical atheist?
I see your point, and I would fully expect God to do so, knowing what a REAL Daddy He is.
The critics would say that you can't just embrace a benevolant easygoing God who saves everybody...because what would be the point of the Bible texts that say that narrow is the path and few find it? Maybe the modern day Pharisees are scared that they could not manipulate their flock if it was known that God loves and accepts everybody! Even if they don't put any bling bling in the plate!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by jar, posted 10-05-2004 10:33 AM jar has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 95 of 466 (148494)
10-08-2004 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by crashfrog
10-08-2004 5:42 PM


Amateur Hour
Crashfrog, bear with me...I want to play a bit of amateur psychologist, here. Answer me a couple of questions.
1) How was your relationship with your Dad or Father figure that you had while growing up? Is there any anger surrounding this situation?
2) My guess(which is probably wrong) is that you had some issues in this area.
This message has been edited by Phatboy, 10-08-2004 05:00 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by crashfrog, posted 10-08-2004 5:42 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by crashfrog, posted 10-08-2004 6:03 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 98 by Dan Carroll, posted 10-08-2004 6:05 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 112 of 466 (148753)
10-10-2004 2:38 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by jar
10-09-2004 8:28 PM


Gosh, Jar, you DO have a pretty good defense of your favorite scripture. I am impressed! One minor detail. This scripture refers to the state of the world AFTER the church has been taken up. The ones left are the bretheren, Jewish believers, and the nations, all other non christian people. Just a footnote.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by jar, posted 10-09-2004 8:28 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by jar, posted 10-10-2004 1:01 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 114 of 466 (148930)
10-10-2004 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by jar
10-10-2004 1:01 PM


Dispensationalism unplugged
Like I said, jar--this is one possible interpretation. To understand it, you have to understand dispensationalism.
Greg Herrick writes:
The dispensation of grace begins in Acts 2 and carries through to Revelation 19:21. The Church is the main revelation of this period and is made up of all those who are baptized by the Holy Spirit. The Church is to preach the gospel to the ends of the earth and rely on the indwelling Spirit to overcome sin. The ultimate end of the church age is apostasy (Tim.4:1-3) and judgment in the great tribulation (after the rapture of the church). Since the revelation extends to the whole world, the whole world will experience God’s judgment (Rev.3:10). The glory of God is seen primarily in His grace to undeserving sinners through the loving sacrificial death of His Son and His wisdom in devising such a plan to include everyone in his mercy (Romans 11:33).
The Jews, whom were the First Chosen would be the Last to receive Gods mercy...although they would eventually see what they had been blinded to. The Church, which includes all true believers today, will be taken away from the Earth before the Judgement. Jesus is talking to His Disciples, which are not part of the Church. They are part of the little flock...which gets into an entire discussion on dispensational theology ...but not now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by jar, posted 10-10-2004 1:01 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by jar, posted 10-10-2004 3:40 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 196 of 466 (150804)
10-18-2004 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by jar
10-11-2004 2:41 PM


Re: Back on Topic
Pharisees and Wannabes
jar writes:
Hitler and his senior staff, based on their own writings, were Christians and believed that they were acting based on Biblical teachings.
So we have to base our judgement on what a person DOES rather than what they say or proclaim....right, Jar? Who or what does a person worship? I use this term loosely...for an atheist, for example, who or what passion occupies their time, talent, and attention? I must say, Jar that you did open a very large and productive can of worms with your Sheep and Goats scripture. Good job!
Brian writes:
Not everyone who calls me LORD will enter into heaven, surely you have to walk the walk to be a Christian?
Yet nobody that I know walks this walk 100% of the time. Is salvation merely a huge game of cosmic musical chairs? If the music (your life) stops at a time when you are not doing or thinking good works, do you forfeit a seat at the great table in the sky? Obviously, we can not really judge anyone. Only God does that, according to my belief.
Brian writes:
Shouldn't that be 'throughout history there have been some very very bad people who thought they were Christians'?
Good point, Brian. I might add that many if not most of the early Popes certainly were suspect. Just because a person thinks that they are saved does not mean that they are saved. Salvation, in my view, is based upon TRUST and RELATIONSHIP rather than EFFORT. It does follow, however, that if one trusts Jesus and loves Him, fostering a daily relationship of prayer and awareness of Christ, one WILL do many good works.
Lam writes:
Many people, including myself, would call what you just said the no true scottsman fallacy. You've created a definition of a christian that excludes just about everyone that you personally don't think worthy of being called christian.
As for me, I am not the judge of you, Lam. Personally, I have nothing against you. You have no more sin in your life than anyone else on this board or anywhere.We all have issues.
Brian writes:
There is nothing more hypocritical than someone who thinks they are a Christian. I have only met a handful of people that I think deserve the name, there are obviously many others, but I have only met a few, and I have met an awful lot of 'Christians'.
Personally, I think if someone is saved they behave in a Christ-like way, I do not see the people you mentioned acting like this.
As for myself, I have come to the realization that I NEED Jesus every minute of every day. I behave in a Christ-like way less than I should. One clarification, here, Brian. Is a Christian someone who behaves in a Christ-like way? If so, I am a Christian perhaps 5% of the time. I call myself a work in progress, and I suppose that the next question is this: If I, or you, or anyone else is to be considered a work in progress (towards salvation) WHO is it that completes the work?
Brian writes:
When you say 'saved' in the OP, what exactly do you mean, saved from what?
I have heard several answers for this one. Some say that we are saved from God Himself. Others say that we are saved from our own imperfections by allowing a "perfect Spirit" to in effect become our patch. I prefer to use the term adopted. We are adopted into the family of the perfect Spirit of love. One concern that many have is this: Must I lose my identity?
Brian writes:
One of the criteria you present for being saved is to 'Love God', can you tell me how an atheist or a Buddhist will ever fulfil this?
I liken the event to "meeting Jesus." If this meeting between God in the flesh and man is initiated by God, it is then up to us to accept the relationship. If I walk down a street, I encounter many people, yet I may meet only a few of them. If Jesus is who He says He is, one will be changed upon meeting Him. To an atheist, the only requirement is not to believe that this will happen so much as being open to the possibility of positive change. To a Buddhist who "meets" Jesus, they will then become a Buddhist with a personal relationship with Jesus. They will not become a Southern Baptist ex Buddhist! It may well be, however, that as the life of that person changes, they may choose a different religion, but this is NOT about religion. A Christian is one who Knows Christ rather than one who teaches Christian principles.
Jar writes:
What I don't want to do is get into "What a true Christian is" or what the definitions of salvation or damnation are.
And so, I will shut up, now. Enough of my preaching!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by jar, posted 10-11-2004 2:41 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by jar, posted 10-19-2004 12:47 AM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18300
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 201 of 466 (150984)
10-19-2004 12:13 AM
Reply to: Message 200 by AdminNosy
10-18-2004 3:19 PM


Re: Chasing
"New Thread"??? Wassup, Nosy?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by AdminNosy, posted 10-18-2004 3:19 PM AdminNosy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by NosyNed, posted 01-10-2005 12:55 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024