Atheism isn't a belief?

iano writes:find it interesting that given the incompleteness of evidence of first cause either for God or for a Natural explaination, that a person who has no evidence either way plumps for no God. Both are expressions of faith without concrete evidence, both are religions.

iano writes:Whilst athiesm maybe irrational (your implication I hasten to add, I'd call it 'religion' - that doesn't sound so bad ) belief in God is not irrational if God has revealed himself to you. You might not have any basis to prove it to others but they can't disprove the proof given that your proof is supernatural so can't be dispproven naturally. That is different to the athiests position - which may be disproven if any proofs are posed for which there is no scientific (natural) evidence.