Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,469 Year: 3,726/9,624 Month: 597/974 Week: 210/276 Day: 50/34 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheism isn't a belief?
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 9 of 329 (233946)
08-17-2005 7:21 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Trump won
08-16-2005 9:17 PM


All of our convictions are beliefs, right?
I don't see that they are. I personally consider "belief" to cover only those things that I have to accept without evidence.
Since I try not to have any of those, I don't accept that atheism is a belief. Particularly since it's a position characterized by a lack of certain beliefs.
If atheism is a belief then "bald" is a hair color.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Trump won, posted 08-16-2005 9:17 PM Trump won has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by iano, posted 08-17-2005 7:30 AM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 11 of 329 (233948)
08-17-2005 7:23 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by iano
08-17-2005 6:56 AM


Re: As I understand it
Which they could hardly be expected to.
Depending on how you define the supernatural, which is really just a catch-all term for whatever unscientific nonsense you'd like to insert into the discussion, we might indeed have a very reasonable expectation of being able to apply rational empiricism to the subject.
For instance if the "supernatural" I was presented with was telekinesis, a person with the power to move objects with his mind at will, why would that not be ameinable to rational, empirical study of his powers and capabilities?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by iano, posted 08-17-2005 6:56 AM iano has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 13 of 329 (233951)
08-17-2005 7:40 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by iano
08-17-2005 7:30 AM


An athiest will lack belief in God but will believe in natural first cause.
Why do you continue to make authorititative statements about what atheists believe after having been told, by atheists, that they do not believe those things?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by iano, posted 08-17-2005 7:30 AM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Phat, posted 08-17-2005 10:52 AM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 62 of 329 (234197)
08-17-2005 5:27 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by iano
08-17-2005 9:08 AM


Re: Considering investigating God
All that remains is to ask Him to reveal himself. As simple and as hard as that. Simple, because it would only be the simplest form of words required. Hard because in following the hypothesis means those words would have to come from the very bottom of your heart. No one knows where that is. You'd have to trust that he would
I performed your experiment with no results. Can you explain?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by iano, posted 08-17-2005 9:08 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by iano, posted 08-18-2005 8:46 AM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 63 of 329 (234200)
08-17-2005 5:35 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by iano
08-17-2005 11:15 AM


Re: Considering investigating God?
See post currently in Proposed topics: "A reasoned proof of God" It demonstrates that you, as you are this instant, was guaranteed to happen given the initial conditions that existed at the start of the universe.
It would be nice if that thread could be promoted to discussion; I have a few thoughts on that - mostly that you incorrectly assume a deterministic universe, when it's abundantly clear that we live in a nondeterministic one - but I don't think they're on topic, here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by iano, posted 08-17-2005 11:15 AM iano has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 138 of 329 (235066)
08-20-2005 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by iano
08-20-2005 5:50 PM


On Overreaching
Me, I'm inclined to think more highly of you
I've never understood this kind of thinking.
Go outside with a yardstick. Mark off a square on somebody's lawn, or out in some scrubland somewhere - anywhere handy that isn't pavement - one meter by one meter. Imagine the volume formed if you go a meter up into the air and a half-meter down into the soil from that square.
Now imagine everything that's in that cube-and-a-half. Probably about 80 lbs of soil, 1 m3 of air, and tens of thousands of individual living things. You could spend a lifetime studying the properties of what you have in that volume. Geology, biology, physics - it's a tiny universe of things to be discovered that you've marked out with your yardstick.
Now imagine how many such volumes exist on this one planet alone, and that's just the land surface, one third of the surface of the Earth. Try to imagine how many one-meter cubes you could stack to fill up the oceans and the seas, if you can.
Every cube a universe of discovery. A lifetime of study. And that's not enough for you? You find that so ordinary, so pedestrian, so insignificant that you have to make up more stuff to wonder about? You have to waste your time with stories about a magic skyman that wouldn't convince a child?
The arrogance of the believer is sometimes truly astounding. Flabbergasting in it's all-too-human contradiction. It'd be funny if people didn't take it all so seriously. It'd be funny if telling you this wasn't something that would get me killed in the sort of society where it's your views that inform the legal system and not mine.
This message has been edited by crashfrog, 08-20-2005 07:20 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by iano, posted 08-20-2005 5:50 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by iano, posted 08-22-2005 5:57 AM crashfrog has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024