Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,398 Year: 3,655/9,624 Month: 526/974 Week: 139/276 Day: 13/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How did animal get to isolated places after the flood?
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 151 of 194 (386323)
02-20-2007 10:32 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by ringo
02-20-2007 4:30 PM


God only (maybe) knows what this has to do with the topic (accuracy / precision)
You still don't seem to be understanding the difference between accuracy and precision. Exactness (accuracy) is irrelevant.
If the results are precise - i.e. if everybody gets the same result - they are objective.
Oh high and mighty one - I think you have the meanings of accuracy and precision turned around, or at least muddled.
From Accuracy and precision - Wikipedia:
quote:
In the fields of science, engineering, industry and statistics, accuracy is the degree of conformity of a measured or calculated quantity to its actual (true) value. Accuracy is closely related to precision, also called reproducibility or repeatability, the degree to which further measurements or calculations will show the same or similar results.
The results of calculations or a measurement can be accurate but not precise; precise but not accurate; neither; or both. A result is called valid if it is both accurate and precise.
Let the truth be equal to 4.3587.
If you say the correct value is 4, then you are being accurate but not very precise.
If you say the correct value is 3.25792317, then you are being very precise but also are being very inaccurate.
One can reproduce very precise results that are also very inaccurate, if you have some sort of consistent error somewhere (say your ruler starts from 1 rather than from 0).
Please also see the "target analogy" at the above cited.
Now, what does this have to do with "How did animal get to isolated places after the flood?"? New topic time?
Ringo writes:
(This is all very basic stuff, but if you really don't understand it, we should take it somewhere where it's on topic.)
OK, we have an "off-topic" agreement.
Or something like that.
Moose

Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment.
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." - John Kenneth Galbraith
"I know a little about a lot of things, and a lot about a few things, but I'm highly ignorant about everything." - Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by ringo, posted 02-20-2007 4:30 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 152 by ringo, posted 02-21-2007 12:46 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024