Your argument from incredulity is that millions of years is way too long. Many here find it hard to believe that the world is 10000yrs old or less, but refuse to use it as the basis of an argument.
The bottoms of some oceans and the deltic basins appear to have existed for a long time. These areas accumulate much more sediment than they lose and are not sitting still. If the ocean recedes then deposition stops and a portion may even erode away, but over the long haul any area that is covered by a sea for most of the time accumulates sediments.
Tectonic movement, over millions of years, may change an area that was for millions of years an ocean into, for instance, a brackish swamp. If this swamp persisted for a fairly long period then it would be later represented as a different layer on top of the previous marine sediment.
The alteration and fossil composition of these layers posed a problem for geologists of the 18th and 19th centuries, who noticed comonalities of strata in different areas when strata maps were compared. These common rock layers compise the geologic column. This concept was accepted by most scientists almost 200 years ago. Most of these scientists were originally creationist or were still subsequently religious. The 20th century brought radiometeric dating which furthur correlated these layers.
Yes, most geologists extrapolate from present day processes...this is uniformitatarian view as opposed to your catastrophist view that things must have been quite different on earth just a few thousand years ago.
And if 50 mil yrs for the Redwall bothers you then the 600+ mil yrs for the whole formation and 4.6 bil yrs for the age of earth must make you very incredulous.
So your objections are the deposition problem and extreme age.
Deposition occurs in some areas at such a rate as to exceed erosion, such as sea beds and deltic fans. That some areas have more deposition than erosion (and therefore sedimentation) has been shown to you in many forms.
It has also been shown that young earth creationists have more inconsistencies to deal with than old earthers, with fossil stratigraphy, radiometric dating, and lack of sufficient time for rock lithification or metamorphasis as just the beginning.
What particular scientific objections do you have to an old earth may be the next question to furthur plumb the depths of your geologic doubts.
ABB