Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,865 Year: 4,122/9,624 Month: 993/974 Week: 320/286 Day: 41/40 Hour: 7/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What evidence absolutely rules out a Creator
ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 17 of 300 (294755)
03-12-2006 11:24 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by robinrohan
03-12-2006 9:11 PM


robinrohan writes:
... the Fall does not mix with evolution. Therefore, no God.
"The Fall" is poor theology. It never happened.
Therefore, no conflict between God and evolution.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by robinrohan, posted 03-12-2006 9:11 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by robinrohan, posted 03-12-2006 11:25 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 21 of 300 (294759)
03-12-2006 11:29 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by robinrohan
03-12-2006 11:25 PM


robinrohan writes:
Big time conflict, Ringo.
Maybe you're not familiar with how a debate works, robin. You make an actual point and then somebody addresses it.
So far, all you've said is a lot of nothing.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by robinrohan, posted 03-12-2006 11:25 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by robinrohan, posted 03-12-2006 11:40 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 26 of 300 (294767)
03-12-2006 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by robinrohan
03-12-2006 11:40 PM


robinrohan writes:
This does not sound like the good God we know of from our catechism.
Then your catechism is wrong. Mine neither says nor implies any such thing.
... in the old days, before evolutionary ideas, we had to assume special creation because there was no other way to explain our being here.
I, for one, need no explanation. Therefore, I need no assumption for or against special creation.
You are assuming that God can only be as you imagine Her. You imagine Her wrong.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by robinrohan, posted 03-12-2006 11:40 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by robinrohan, posted 03-12-2006 11:50 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 440 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 29 of 300 (294772)
03-12-2006 11:55 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by robinrohan
03-12-2006 11:50 PM


robinrohan writes:
What a silly answer. Do you want to face the facts or live in your dream world?
Do you want to discuss the topic or trade rejoinders?
If you think my reply is "silly", show how. Otherwise, quit wasting my time.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by robinrohan, posted 03-12-2006 11:50 PM robinrohan has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024