Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,871 Year: 4,128/9,624 Month: 999/974 Week: 326/286 Day: 47/40 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dear fellow christian, judge not lest you be judged
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1532 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 196 of 241 (142811)
09-16-2004 6:52 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by dpardo
09-16-2004 5:45 PM


The Two Contradictory Creation Accounts This link provides a concise comparison as well.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by dpardo, posted 09-16-2004 5:45 PM dpardo has not replied

dpardo
Inactive Member


Message 197 of 241 (142831)
09-16-2004 8:02 PM


Genesis 2 is not proposing a different chronology of events than Genesis 1.
It is expounding on some of the events of Genesis 1 and also continuing the story.

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3485 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 198 of 241 (142838)
09-16-2004 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 191 by mike the wiz
09-16-2004 2:38 PM


Big Jump
quote:
I think we can now agree, and have established that these prophecies about Christ are accurate.
Accurate about what?
The verses you printed from Psalm 22 (Message 153) can be applied to any one, if not several, of the the political antagonists that the Romans crucified in the first century. They probably felt the same way. Roman Crucifiction
Psalm 22
16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: they pierced my hands and my feet.
17: I may tell all my bones: they look and stare upon me.
18: They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture
Of course from the Hebrew Bible we have:
Psalm 22
16 My strength is dried up like a potsherd; and my tongue cleaveth to my throat; and Thou layest me in the dust of death. 17 For dogs have encompassed me; a company of evil-doers have inclosed me; like a lion, they are at my hands and my feet. 18 I may count all my bones; they look and gloat over me. 19 They part my garments among them, and for my vesture do they cast lots.
IMO, since the song is written in present tense, it would apply more to the author's feelings and situation at the time it was written not a future incident.

A gentle answer turns away wrath, But a harsh word stirs up anger.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 191 by mike the wiz, posted 09-16-2004 2:38 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 199 of 241 (142909)
09-17-2004 10:30 AM
Reply to: Message 195 by mike the wiz
09-16-2004 6:47 PM


Mike writes:
You missed my point. What if the rules make it so that truth is not seen? "Wars and rumours of wars" you might say - according to your rules, "not a valid prophecy" but even if the rule makes it invalid, it might still be true!
And once again Mike claps his hands over his ears and refuses to listen to what he doesn't want to hear, then repeats himself ad nauseum.
I didn't miss your point... I addressed it directly:
Dan writes:
It is true, in the same way as Rei's prophecy about the sun rising. In which case the answer is "it's true... but who cares? My five year old neice could make that prophecy." Does it even count as a prophecy at that point? Well duh, no it doesn't. It counts as saying something really freakin' obvious. Or is Rei a divine prophet for knowing the sun will rise?
Nobody is dismissing the truth of the statement. We're simply responding "so what? That so-called prophecy is just a blindingly obvious statement of fact. It's like claiming divine powers for stating that the sun will come up tomorrow."
So give us an actual prophecy, Mike. Not a blindingly obvious statement of fact.

"Good evening. I'm playing the role of Jesus; a man once portrayed on the big screen by Jeffery Hunter. You may remember him as the actor who was replaced by William Shatner on Star Trek. Apparently Mr. Hunter was good enough to die for our sins, but not quite up to the task of seducing green women."
-Stewie Griffin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by mike the wiz, posted 09-16-2004 6:47 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by mike the wiz, posted 09-20-2004 12:44 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1268 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 200 of 241 (143093)
09-18-2004 2:12 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Trump won
09-12-2004 3:21 PM


Re: real nonsense
I'm saying that in the scriptures, the power that they portray him to have would most liiely make him capable of changing form.

-porcelain

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Trump won, posted 09-12-2004 3:21 PM Trump won has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by purpledawn, posted 09-19-2004 8:31 AM Trump won has not replied

Trump won 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1268 days)
Posts: 1928
Joined: 01-12-2004


Message 201 of 241 (143095)
09-18-2004 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by nator
09-13-2004 4:42 PM


Re: Nonsense.
The prophecy of schrafinator came true.
I had a discussion with a teacher of mine, I had thought he was an atheist, well that was the impression I got, probably from my christian bias. He has a belief in a supreme being. I asked him why he came to that conclusion and he mentioned having dreams of a past life, he believes God is in everything and that everyone finds God a different way. Some may find the christian God, some may find Allah, but he said to ignore the existence of a God is to ignore life around you, and that you can't convince anyone of anything, mentioning the futility of participating in a board like this.
Religion was created to give people hope, why ancient people, the Paleolithic came to an explanation of a God and an afterlife is beyond me. Maybe there is san argument for "looking at life around you" and coming to a conclusion of a "God"

-porcelain

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by nator, posted 09-13-2004 4:42 PM nator has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3485 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 202 of 241 (143178)
09-19-2004 8:31 AM
Reply to: Message 200 by Trump won
09-18-2004 2:12 PM


Re: real nonsense
I'm curious, which scriptures give you the impression that "Satan" or the "Devil" would have the power to change his physical form?

A gentle answer turns away wrath, But a harsh word stirs up anger.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by Trump won, posted 09-18-2004 2:12 PM Trump won has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 203 of 241 (143345)
09-20-2004 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by Dan Carroll
09-17-2004 10:30 AM


Sorry Dan, in my late reply, I didn't attend Friday/Sat.
Nobody is dismissing the truth of the statement. We're simply responding "so what? That so-called prophecy is just a blindingly obvious statement of fact. It's like claiming divine powers for stating that the sun will come up tomorrow."
However, everybody knows the chances of the sun rising tomorrow. And I'm not hanging Jesus's divine powers on this prophecy alone. I'd rather not remove a truth because of your rules. In effect, I only agreed to them in that other thread alone - for mere argument's sake. But now, I have shown nevertheless, specific biblical prophecies in Isaiah, which came to pass in the NT.
Maybe you missed reading the earlier thread?
You see, Christ predicted wars, and rumours of them, and it is a prophecy. Specificity alone is not the purpose of prophecy.
If he said "And Hitler will attempt world domination in world war 2" rather than "wars and rumours of wars" - then he wouldn't be addressing the purpose. In essence, this particular prophecy must be vague, or he would have gave a long list of specific end-time catastrophisms, and to do what? Prove himself when he preaches belief?
Yet he said "wars and ru...." - which doesn't mean he is not telling the truth. However, I am aware of the fact that you dimiss this as a good example of prophecy, and I think I have offered specific ones in this thread. If you read through the earlier thread, you will see that Shraff dismissed my examples because she didn't want to admitt their accuracy. Please read!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-17-2004 10:30 AM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by PaulK, posted 09-20-2004 12:53 PM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 205 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-20-2004 1:29 PM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 206 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-20-2004 1:43 PM mike the wiz has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17827
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.3


Message 204 of 241 (143347)
09-20-2004 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by mike the wiz
09-20-2004 12:44 PM


Mike, unless this is another joke on your part, it seems that you STILL don't understand the point of the rules.
The rules are NOT to identify whether a prediction is true or false they are there to say whether the prophecy is good EVIDENCE of genuine foreknowledge. Let me make that very clear - if you say that the sun will rise tomorrow you MIGHT have genuine foreknowledge - but there is no way to tell. And that is what the rules are for - to idnetify those prophecies (if any) that DO tell us that the originator had genuine foreknowledge. "Wars and rumours of wars" on its own isn't even as good as "the sun will rise tomorrow" - with no time limit there's not even a way to to be certain that it failed in the unlikely event that long-term peace broke out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by mike the wiz, posted 09-20-2004 12:44 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 205 of 241 (143352)
09-20-2004 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by mike the wiz
09-20-2004 12:44 PM


However, everybody knows the chances of the sun rising tomorrow.
And everybody knows that at some indeterminate point in the future, there will be wars and rumors of war. What's your point?
I'd rather not remove a truth because of your rules.
I don't recall striking any passages out of the bible. Only saying "unimpressive, what else you got?" (And judging by the lack of prophecies you've put up to the rules so far, the answer would seem to be "nothing".)
But now, I have shown nevertheless, specific biblical prophecies in Isaiah, which came to pass in the NT.
Gimme some extra-biblical corroboration, Mike. The Bible claiming that the Bible is true means nothing.
In essence, this particular prophecy must be vague
Well, bully for Jesus. He may have his reasons for making an obvious statement of fact, but it doesn't change that it is an obvious statement of fact.
Yet he said "wars and ru...." - which doesn't mean he is not telling the truth.
Or that you're listening, even a little bit.
WHETHER THE PROPHECY IS TRUE IS IRRELEVANT TO WHETHER IT IS VALID OR IMPRESSIVE.
Do we need to get some handpuppets or something? Will that help you understand this incredibly simple point?
(edited for grammar)
This message has been edited by Dan Carroll, 09-20-2004 12:31 PM

"Good evening. I'm playing the role of Jesus; a man once portrayed on the big screen by Jeffery Hunter. You may remember him as the actor who was replaced by William Shatner on Star Trek. Apparently Mr. Hunter was good enough to die for our sins, but not quite up to the task of seducing green women."
-Stewie Griffin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by mike the wiz, posted 09-20-2004 12:44 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 206 of 241 (143354)
09-20-2004 1:43 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by mike the wiz
09-20-2004 12:44 PM


To put it another way... I predict that at some point, the political right in America will do something that will offend the political left in America.
It's a true statement. And the truth of the statement does NOTHING to give ANYONE ANY REASON WHATSOEVER to be impressed by the "prophecy" I have delivered unto you.
So does the Bible have any prophecies that would give us reason to be impressed? Any at all?

"Good evening. I'm playing the role of Jesus; a man once portrayed on the big screen by Jeffery Hunter. You may remember him as the actor who was replaced by William Shatner on Star Trek. Apparently Mr. Hunter was good enough to die for our sins, but not quite up to the task of seducing green women."
-Stewie Griffin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by mike the wiz, posted 09-20-2004 12:44 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3976
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 207 of 241 (143359)
09-20-2004 2:33 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by mike the wiz
09-06-2004 1:31 PM


Just in case topic drift has happened, here is a replay of message 1
I haven't been following this topic much, but I'm pretty confident that it's been drifting all over the place. So here is a replay of message 1:
quote:
Recently, I made a topic in a christian forum, and their talk indeed angered me. They spoke like they themselves are in the judgement seat of Christ. So here's an excerpt of what I said to them (I was naughty as usual and almost got banished). Now I have fire in my belly for atheists who have indeed been a most kind and goodly nature at this forum evc. I was even offended GREATLY for my atheist brothers/sisters. So I think this is an important message and indeed wisdom is from babes, when B2preach said "justify damnation". Rather, justify damning your fellow servant like you are God! (Only Christ can judge) a person.
------------------------------------------------
I read this; "You are a sinner. Therefore,
unless you believe on Jesus Who died in your
place, you will spend eternity in Hell. "
I read this in part of "God's plan of salvation". To be honest though, I think this is an unnecessary comment? It is down to Christ to judge.
At other forums I am told that I preach a "your going to hell" message, and therefore, I take a lot of flack because of statements like the above.
We shall ALL stand before the judgement seat of Christ, - fair enough, quote what Christ says, but do NOT make such comments about "unless you believe". We know what Christ says, but that doesn't give us the right to say to someone "your going to hell unless".
Infact, in the NT there is comments about why God plans to be merciful to all. I am not saying that none-believers are going to heaven. WHAT I AM SAYING is that NO MAN WHO IS DUST can say to another man "you are going to hell unless....". We have no right to judge any person's situation.
Quote the Lord, but know this - you are not God that you can judge your fellow servant.
Even people's unbelief was so others could believe. Will God have mercy? Let him speak himself rather than saying others are going to hell.
Adminnemooseus

Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to
Change in Moderation?
or
Thread Reopen Requests
or
Considerations of topic promotions from the Proposed New Topics forum

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by mike the wiz, posted 09-06-2004 1:31 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-20-2004 2:35 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 208 of 241 (143360)
09-20-2004 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by Adminnemooseus
09-20-2004 2:33 PM


Re: Just in case topic drift has happened, here is a replay of message 1
I for one, am happy for Mike to leave his response to thoughts from this thread over on the prophecy thread.
How about it, Mike? Want to give us even one impressive prophecy, over on the other thread?

"Good evening. I'm playing the role of Jesus; a man once portrayed on the big screen by Jeffery Hunter. You may remember him as the actor who was replaced by William Shatner on Star Trek. Apparently Mr. Hunter was good enough to die for our sins, but not quite up to the task of seducing green women."
-Stewie Griffin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by Adminnemooseus, posted 09-20-2004 2:33 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 209 by mike the wiz, posted 09-20-2004 2:55 PM Dan Carroll has replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 209 of 241 (143362)
09-20-2004 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 208 by Dan Carroll
09-20-2004 2:35 PM


Re: Just in case topic drift has happened, here is a replay of message 1
Dan, do you mean the "prophecy for Buzsaw" thread? -- Trying to get me in the lions den eh. -I thought you could have the last word in this thread, as we have been spanked for our -off-topic banterisms. Maybe you could observe message one which Adminnemooseus has repeated, and comment on that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 208 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-20-2004 2:35 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by Dan Carroll, posted 09-20-2004 3:00 PM mike the wiz has replied

Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 210 of 241 (143363)
09-20-2004 3:00 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by mike the wiz
09-20-2004 2:55 PM


Re: Just in case topic drift has happened, here is a replay of message 1
Yes, I do mean that thread. And I'm not interested in getting the last word, I'm interested in you not weaseling out of this one. Especially because I fully expect that a month or so down the line, you'll be harping on about Biblical prophecies as if this conversation never happened, telling us all over again that there's simply no prophecy that would hold water with us.
So go to the other thread. Give me one Biblical prophecy that holds up. Just one.

"Good evening. I'm playing the role of Jesus; a man once portrayed on the big screen by Jeffery Hunter. You may remember him as the actor who was replaced by William Shatner on Star Trek. Apparently Mr. Hunter was good enough to die for our sins, but not quite up to the task of seducing green women."
-Stewie Griffin

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by mike the wiz, posted 09-20-2004 2:55 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 211 by mike the wiz, posted 09-20-2004 4:15 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024