They are only physically different, which for obvious reasons, make men better at some things, and women others. That I view the role of the priesthood more suitable to the male gender in natural ways
I don't think anybody can question physical differences between men and women.
But here's a hint, my friend. When you take a leap from weewees and hoohoos, to concluding that "men and women are equal, but are suited for different jobs", but coincidentally the jobs
men are "physically more suited for" are prestigious jobs like church leaders, running businesses, and political offices; and the jobs you believe
women are "suited for" are jobs that are typically undercompensated and underappreciated,
you're a misogynist.
It's true that typically men exhibit greater body strength than women, generally with less effort. But since even a person in a wheelchair - indeed, a quadriplegic - could fulfill the duties necessary to lead a church, it's illogical and sexist to say that the physical differences between men and women make men more suited for church leadership.
The simple truth of the matter is that, by any objective standard,
women are more suited than men for the leadership of ministry - they're typically more likely to be sensitive, introspective, and nurturing, as well as being generally better communicators. However, men lead the church because church leadership is prestigious, and therefore patriarchy excludes women from serving in that way.