|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,809 Year: 4,066/9,624 Month: 937/974 Week: 264/286 Day: 25/46 Hour: 0/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Atheism, a dangerous idea? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Atheism is dangerous.
Nihilism is even more dangerous.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
they know that it's our secret way to bed all those christian girls. Yes, girls love nihilists. It's so romantic. That's why I am one.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
(he must meet some pretty odd women, but anyway). That's one of the advantages of being a nihilist.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Why does it seem like you try to turn everything into a nihilism topic. Ha, ha, ha.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Please, point me to the moral code of an atheist. I'm not a believer and I have a code: "Do what feels honorable; do not do what feels dishonorable." (I don't claim to live up to this code very well, but that's the code).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Awesome, thats great, and honest. But it is your personal code, and subject to what you think is honorable That's right. It's based purely on personal feelings. There's nothing else to base it on.
Would you kill someone who killed one of your loved ones? Whether I would or not I don't know. Probably not. But I would certainly want to.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Thank you for being honest. No thanks necessary. That's part of my code. Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Penn Gilette seems intelligent, happy, compassionate, and loving. I don't know who Penn Gilette is, but being happy and loving and so forth has got nothing to do with either morality or purpose. "Your friends, if they can, may bury you with some distinction, and set up a monument, to let posterity see that your dust lies under such a stone; and when that is done, all is done. Your place is filled up by another, the world is just in the same state it was, you are blotted out of its sight, and as much forgotten by the world as if you had never belonged to it."--William Law
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
To love others and feel compassion for them are part of many moral codes. It is also part of many people's chosen purpose. Well, of course one can make up any code or purpose that one wants to.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Like a moral code that involves killing people who you think are immoral for example? Sure, why not? One code is as valid as another, logically speaking.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
And this makes atheism dangerous? Atheism is extremely dangerous. Name one successful atheist civilization. Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
China?
China? You call that successful?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Yeah, I was talking about the Soviet Union once, and somebody said that the Soviet Union was actually religious. Would you disagree?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
If I am correctly reading the headline article in tomorrow's Chicago Tribune, maybe Ireland comes close. (The article suggests that they are abandoning catholicism in droves). Well, we have to decide what is meant by an "atheist civilization." Sometimes I think the USA is one too. If they would only admit it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
If one calls every form of adulation a religion, then the term religion means just adulation, not worship of a supreme being. I think we should limit the definition myself. If we do, the Soviet Union and China would be non-religious. Not sure about Ireland, however.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024