Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,809 Year: 4,066/9,624 Month: 937/974 Week: 264/286 Day: 25/46 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheism, a dangerous idea?
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 241 (328070)
07-01-2006 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Alan Fox
07-01-2006 9:10 AM


Atheism is dangerous.
Nihilism is even more dangerous.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Alan Fox, posted 07-01-2006 9:10 AM Alan Fox has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by CK, posted 07-01-2006 6:26 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 241 (328076)
07-01-2006 6:30 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by CK
07-01-2006 6:26 PM


they know that it's our secret way to bed all those christian girls.
Yes, girls love nihilists. It's so romantic. That's why I am one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by CK, posted 07-01-2006 6:26 PM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by nwr, posted 07-01-2006 6:55 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 31 by ohnhai, posted 07-02-2006 9:31 AM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 241 (328113)
07-01-2006 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Faith
07-01-2006 7:43 PM


Re: nihilists have purposes too
(he must meet some pretty odd women, but anyway).
That's one of the advantages of being a nihilist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Faith, posted 07-01-2006 7:43 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Adminnemooseus, posted 07-01-2006 8:24 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 241 (328125)
07-01-2006 8:26 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Adminnemooseus
07-01-2006 8:24 PM


Re: Nihilism is not at all the topic theme here!
Why does it seem like you try to turn everything into a nihilism topic.
Ha, ha, ha.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Adminnemooseus, posted 07-01-2006 8:24 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 241 (328522)
07-03-2006 11:35 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by riVeRraT
07-03-2006 11:28 AM


Please, point me to the moral code of an atheist.
I'm not a believer and I have a code: "Do what feels honorable; do not do what feels dishonorable."
(I don't claim to live up to this code very well, but that's the code).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2006 11:28 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2006 11:46 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 71 of 241 (328528)
07-03-2006 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by riVeRraT
07-03-2006 11:46 AM


Re: prime example
Awesome, thats great, and honest. But it is your personal code, and subject to what you think is honorable
That's right. It's based purely on personal feelings. There's nothing else to base it on.
Would you kill someone who killed one of your loved ones?
Whether I would or not I don't know. Probably not. But I would certainly want to.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2006 11:46 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2006 11:54 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 76 of 241 (328538)
07-03-2006 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by riVeRraT
07-03-2006 11:54 AM


Re: prime example
Thank you for being honest.
No thanks necessary. That's part of my code.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by riVeRraT, posted 07-03-2006 11:54 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 122 of 241 (328881)
07-05-2006 6:27 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by nator
07-04-2006 9:45 PM


Re: I believe
Penn Gilette seems intelligent, happy, compassionate, and loving.
I don't know who Penn Gilette is, but being happy and loving and so forth has got nothing to do with either morality or purpose.

"Your friends, if they can, may bury you with some distinction, and set up a monument, to let posterity see that your dust lies under such a stone; and when that is done, all is done. Your place is filled up by another, the world is just in the same state it was, you are blotted out of its sight, and as much forgotten by the world as if you had never belonged to it."--William Law

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by nator, posted 07-04-2006 9:45 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by nator, posted 07-05-2006 7:37 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 124 of 241 (328893)
07-05-2006 8:04 AM
Reply to: Message 123 by nator
07-05-2006 7:37 AM


Re: I believe
To love others and feel compassion for them are part of many moral codes.
It is also part of many people's chosen purpose.
Well, of course one can make up any code or purpose that one wants to.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by nator, posted 07-05-2006 7:37 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by iano, posted 07-05-2006 8:09 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 126 of 241 (328896)
07-05-2006 8:10 AM
Reply to: Message 125 by iano
07-05-2006 8:09 AM


Re: I believe
Like a moral code that involves killing people who you think are immoral for example?
Sure, why not?
One code is as valid as another, logically speaking.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by iano, posted 07-05-2006 8:09 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by iano, posted 07-05-2006 8:29 AM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 158 of 241 (329936)
07-08-2006 8:33 PM
Reply to: Message 157 by kongstad
07-08-2006 4:16 AM


Re: Moral standards
And this makes atheism dangerous?
Atheism is extremely dangerous. Name one successful atheist civilization.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by kongstad, posted 07-08-2006 4:16 AM kongstad has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by anglagard, posted 07-08-2006 8:36 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 180 by kongstad, posted 07-09-2006 10:11 AM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 160 of 241 (329942)
07-08-2006 8:38 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by anglagard
07-08-2006 8:36 PM


Re: Moral standards
China?
China?
You call that successful?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by anglagard, posted 07-08-2006 8:36 PM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 161 by anglagard, posted 07-08-2006 8:43 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 162 of 241 (329948)
07-08-2006 8:46 PM
Reply to: Message 161 by anglagard
07-08-2006 8:43 PM


Re: Moral standards
Yeah, I was talking about the Soviet Union once, and somebody said that the Soviet Union was actually religious. Would you disagree?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by anglagard, posted 07-08-2006 8:43 PM anglagard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by anglagard, posted 07-08-2006 9:03 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 164 of 241 (329950)
07-08-2006 8:54 PM
Reply to: Message 163 by nwr
07-08-2006 8:49 PM


Re: Moral standards
If I am correctly reading the headline article in tomorrow's Chicago Tribune, maybe Ireland comes close. (The article suggests that they are abandoning catholicism in droves).
Well, we have to decide what is meant by an "atheist civilization."
Sometimes I think the USA is one too. If they would only admit it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by nwr, posted 07-08-2006 8:49 PM nwr has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by nwr, posted 07-08-2006 9:15 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 170 by anglagard, posted 07-08-2006 9:38 PM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 166 of 241 (329955)
07-08-2006 9:07 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by anglagard
07-08-2006 9:03 PM


Re: Moral standards
If one calls every form of adulation a religion, then the term religion means just adulation, not worship of a supreme being.
I think we should limit the definition myself. If we do, the Soviet Union and China would be non-religious. Not sure about Ireland, however.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by anglagard, posted 07-08-2006 9:03 PM anglagard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024