Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 64/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheism, a dangerous idea?
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 17 of 241 (328118)
07-01-2006 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Alan Fox
07-01-2006 2:18 PM


Also, there is always this equating atheism with Darwinism.
I think the great majority of theists either accept biological evolution theory (call it "Darwinism" if you wish) or are indifferent about it.
Probably a significant portion of the theists view atheism as it's hard variety - "There is no God". And that atheists are hostile to religion. I don't think most atheists are the hard variety and are not hostile to religion, unless perhaps, because some of the religious are to them.
I think that Jimmy Carter was probably the most religious of the recent Presidents. He was quite open about his faith. BUT he did not let his religious faith intrude upon his actions, even if some went against his religious beliefs. For example (as I understand it), per his religious faith, he was anti-abortion. But he felt that it wasn't proper to impose his religious beliefs on others, and thus he was not promoting anti-abortion legislation. He, however, did promote programs to try to minimize the needs for abortion.
In a way, he was functionally a soft athiest as far as his government actions, in that he very much believed in the seperation of church and state.
Or something like that.
Moose

Professor, geology, Whatsamatta U
Evolution - Changes in the environment, caused by the interactions of the components of the environment.
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are subtle and will piss on your computer." - Bruce Graham
"The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." - John Kenneth Galbraith
"I know a little about a lot of things, and a lot about a few things, but I'm highly ignorant about everything." - Moose

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Alan Fox, posted 07-01-2006 2:18 PM Alan Fox has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Chiroptera, posted 07-01-2006 8:22 PM Minnemooseus has not replied
 Message 21 by rgb, posted 07-01-2006 9:17 PM Minnemooseus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024