Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,426 Year: 3,683/9,624 Month: 554/974 Week: 167/276 Day: 7/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What evidence is needed to change a creationist
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5929 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 50 of 144 (447775)
01-10-2008 6:48 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Volunteer
01-10-2008 5:55 PM


Re: Changing my view of creation
Volunteer
If complex systems such as computers require the need of a designer to find both purpose and function it doesn't make logical sense to think that infinitely more complex systems such as the human body occurred without an intelligent agent.
And what of the infinitely more complex system that entails God? What would be the intelligent agency that allows for the complexity of that system?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Volunteer, posted 01-10-2008 5:55 PM Volunteer has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5929 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 70 of 144 (449046)
01-16-2008 9:41 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by ThreeDogs
01-16-2008 9:29 AM


Re: For the sake of the argument?
ThreeDogs
To occur naturally, the wherewithal needed to be present and come together just for the hell of it
This is a contradiction in terms sir. To come together naturally is to do so without the addition of an external agency which is what you then imply by the phrase "the wherewithal needed".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by ThreeDogs, posted 01-16-2008 9:29 AM ThreeDogs has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by ThreeDogs, posted 01-16-2008 9:52 AM sidelined has replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5929 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 75 of 144 (449065)
01-16-2008 10:41 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by ThreeDogs
01-16-2008 9:52 AM


Re: For the sake of the argument?
ThreeDogs
You must have the chemicals, etc., to come together naturally, and you must have them at the right moment in proper proportion.
I thought we were referencing the origin of the universe.At the beginning of the universe chemical elements were not yet a part of things.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by ThreeDogs, posted 01-16-2008 9:52 AM ThreeDogs has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024