Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,848 Year: 4,105/9,624 Month: 976/974 Week: 303/286 Day: 24/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What evidence is needed to change a creationist
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 312 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 37 of 144 (446304)
01-05-2008 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Cold Foreign Object
01-05-2008 2:54 PM


We have always accepted the verdict of science since we were science before the Darwinian turnabout. We reject Darwinian and neo-Darwinian "science".
Which turns out to include such things as gravity, relativity, thermodynamics, nuclear physics, linguistics, geology, meteorology, chemistry, biochemistry, genetics, cosmology, archaeology, information theory, computer science, and any other damn thing that stands in the way of your pet delusion.
If you remove all the stuff that creationists want to be wrong about from the densely interwoven fabric of science, what's left looks like a doily woven by mad spiders.
The same is simply Atheist ideology that acts as a filter controlling the interpretation of evidence.
No, it's the result of hundreds of years of reasearch by hundreds and thousands of people, who, not being as stupid and lazy and arrogant as creationists, studied nature and learned about it --- while creationists passed the time sitting on their fat lazy arses whining and lying about anyone with the guts and the brains to face reality head-on
A tradition that I see you are keeping up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 01-05-2008 2:54 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Percy, posted 01-05-2008 5:24 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024