Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What evidence is needed to change a creationist
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3619 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 34 of 144 (446267)
01-05-2008 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Lithodid-Man
12-24-2007 3:33 AM


Creationists can and do change their minds. The 'evidence' most creationists really need is this:

One can accept the findings of science and be a good moral person and a devout Christian who remains in good standing with one's religious leaders and family and fellow members of the club.
They need to know that the coast is clear. That is is safe for them to acknowledge the findings of science.
Note that the evidence they seek is not the kind science can provide. It's a signal that has to come from the preachers and relatives and Sunday School teachers who set the boundaries in their communities. Until they see that green light, most won't budge.
_________
Edited by Archer Opterix, : html.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : typo.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Lithodid-Man, posted 12-24-2007 3:33 AM Lithodid-Man has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 01-05-2008 2:54 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3619 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 39 of 144 (446461)
01-06-2008 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Cold Foreign Object
01-05-2008 2:54 PM


CFO:
We have always accepted the verdict of science since we were science before the Darwinian turnabout. We reject Darwinian and neo-Darwinian "science". The same is simply Atheist ideology that acts as a filter controlling the interpretation of evidence.
One day a prominent enough evangelical celebrity--a Graham or Dobson successor--is going to say 'You know, I don't think we should ever have made a test of fellowship about this whole evolution thing. Plenty of good, honest Christians accept it and it does no harm to their Christian faith.'
On that day, you're going to see attitudes change so fast your head will spin. Countless 'evo-gelicals' will start emerging from their closets--people who have been making their careers in biomed and the oil industry and hundreds of other areas, people who have known all along that their YEC preachers didn't really know what they were talking about, but who kept their mouths shut for the sake of peace and quiet and keeping their family's place in the pew.
On that day, Ray, your children--maybe even you yourself--will be here parroting the new party line as their own idea. They will tell us that far too much has been made of evolution, that it shouldn't be a 'test of fellowship' among Christians. And they will think themselves very tolerant and accepting and Christian for taking the attitude they take.
Don't believe me? Check the profound shift in attitude toward divorce that fundamentalists and evangelicals exhibited in just one generation. People in second and third marriages went from being ostracized in the 1970s to being welcomed with no questions asked in the 1990s. The Scriptures didn't change. The preachers did.
Fundies are far more adaptable than they are given credit for. The entire herd can turn on a dime once its leaders give the signal.
______
Edited by Archer Opterix, : html.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 01-05-2008 2:54 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3619 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 53 of 144 (447854)
01-11-2008 6:00 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by AdminNosy
01-11-2008 1:41 AM


Re: Topic Control Volunteer
I second our admin, Volunteer. Looks like you already have the start of a workable OP in Message 51.
The evolution of nervous and circulatory systems is a fascinating topic. We could get a good thread out of questions like these.
Welcome to EvC.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by AdminNosy, posted 01-11-2008 1:41 AM AdminNosy has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3619 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 54 of 144 (447855)
01-11-2008 6:11 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by nwr
01-08-2008 1:27 PM


on second thought....
Volunteer:
Molecular biologist and medical doctor Michael Denton - "Ultimately the Darwinian theory of evolution is no more nor less than the great cosmogenic myth of the twentieth century." Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis
(Bethesda, Md: Adler & Adler Publishers, Inc. 1986), p.358.
nwr:
A quote from a review of a more recent Denton book: "From the impossibility of evolution to the inevitability of evolution: Anti-Evolutionist Michael Denton turns into an 'Evolutionist'.
Please feel free, Volunteer, to quote Denton's more recent work as well.
Edited by Archer Opterix, : html.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by nwr, posted 01-08-2008 1:27 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024