Ahhhh. This topic is running amok! Here is mikehagars original statement:
It is my contention that accepting the existence of a deity logically forces the believer, if they are consistent, to also believe in myriad other fanciful imaginings.
We can either stick with tried and true provable concepts,
we can speculate on scientific theories that are as yet theoretical, or, as Mike suggests, we can accept the fanciful world of the supernatural.
Has everyone made their points? Is there anything that you wanted to continue with, Mike? The ball is again in your court.
™ Version 4.2