Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Who Are The Xians? What Is Xmas?
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1424 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 286 of 301 (268927)
12-13-2005 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 283 by ringo
12-13-2005 5:21 PM


Re: Listen ye, and heed irrefutable wisdom
That analogy doesn't work. The "n-word" was first used by white people specifically to demean black people. Black people have co-opted the word and use it to feel good about themselves, but it is still inappropriate for white people to use it because of the history of demeaning.
The "X-word", on the other hand, was first used by Christians to describe themselves. It is totally appropriate because there simply is no connection between it and any intention to demean.
It's all about context and the meaning behind the usage of the word.
My mom has "pet names" for each of her sons; do you really think we didn't take those same names and use them to make fun of each other? Do you think the effect of my mom calling her sons by these names and the brothers calling each other by these names was different?
You seem to think it's the content of the word that really matters, when really... the context usually makes the referent clear. You could pretty much use any word to refer to someone, Bongo. The word really turns into a marker of attitude.
Kobe Bryant gave himself the nickname "Mamba". Bill Simmons, a sports writer for ESPN.com, thought it was so ridiculous, he now will ONLY call Kobe Bryant by the name Mamba. Simmons uses Mamba in many ways, such as "Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Mamba" or the sort. Do you think Kobe would really appreciate Simmon's use of "Mamba", even when Simmons uses it to refer to Kobe Bryant?
This is just insane. Y'all talk about words and meaning like they're things you look up in a dictionary. THEY'RE NOT. They're social constructs. A dictionary is a sometimes useful tool for learning about what social constructs have existed and may exist. They don't reperesent how language is used or from where meaning derives.
Right, Bongo?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 283 by ringo, posted 12-13-2005 5:21 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 287 by ramoss, posted 12-13-2005 6:13 PM Ben! has not replied
 Message 288 by ringo, posted 12-13-2005 7:53 PM Ben! has not replied

ramoss
Member (Idle past 637 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 287 of 301 (268939)
12-13-2005 6:13 PM
Reply to: Message 286 by Ben!
12-13-2005 5:50 PM


Re: Listen ye, and heed irrefutable wisdom
Yes, they are social constructs.
But, the people I know that use the term Xtian and Xmas the most are Christians, They use Xtian to refer to themselves. Just because some evangalistic Christians suddenly deciede it is demeaning doesn't mean that the Christians that use those terms mean to be demeaning to themselves.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by Ben!, posted 12-13-2005 5:50 PM Ben! has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 290 by Buzsaw, posted 12-13-2005 9:20 PM ramoss has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 288 of 301 (268984)
12-13-2005 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 286 by Ben!
12-13-2005 5:50 PM


Ben writes:
You could pretty much use any word to refer to someone, Bongo.
Exactly, Bun. That's why the word itself is irrelevant.
If Christians were called "Bians" or "Mians", would buzsaw be so upset? I doubt it. It's his own projection of an English "x" and its connotations that he objects to. He thinks the "x" means "delete" regardless of what the intention was.
If he's going to get upset by what he thinks somebody is saying, he can get upset at anything. We might just as well call him a @#$% because he's going to think we're calling him that anyway.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by Ben!, posted 12-13-2005 5:50 PM Ben! has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 289 by Buzsaw, posted 12-13-2005 9:08 PM ringo has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 289 of 301 (269010)
12-13-2005 9:08 PM
Reply to: Message 288 by ringo
12-13-2005 7:53 PM


Read Right, Ringo
Ringo writes:
If Christians were called "Bians" or "Mians", would buzsaw be so upset? I doubt it. It's his own projection of an English "x" and its connotations that he objects to. He thinks the "x" means "delete" regardless of what the intention was.
You need to go back and reread me, my friend. Nowhere did I say that it has to mean 'delete' regardless of intent. I said it can represent anything, including the Greek chi but does not necessarily mean any specific thing. It is an English X and can mean anything that either the user or the reader perceives it to mean. I fully agree with Ben. It does not necessarily have to represent the ancient Greek Chi.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 288 by ringo, posted 12-13-2005 7:53 PM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 291 by crashfrog, posted 12-13-2005 9:55 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 290 of 301 (269015)
12-13-2005 9:20 PM
Reply to: Message 287 by ramoss
12-13-2005 6:13 PM


Re: Listen ye, and heed irrefutable wisdom
ramos writes:
the people I know that use the term Xtian and Xmas the most are Christians, They use Xtian to refer to themselves. Just because some evangalistic Christians suddenly deciede it is demeaning doesn't mean that the Christians that use those terms mean to be demeaning to themselves.
That's interesting, given that in my extensive weekly involvement in scores of churches for 60 years I've never heard or read where any of the literally thousands of Christians I've been around referring to themselves or other Christians by those terms until I got my PC and here it is rarely used by practicing devouts, being used mostly by folks unsupportive of Christianity.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 287 by ramoss, posted 12-13-2005 6:13 PM ramoss has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1492 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 291 of 301 (269029)
12-13-2005 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 289 by Buzsaw
12-13-2005 9:08 PM


Re: Read Right, Ringo
It does not necessarily have to represent the ancient Greek Chi.
You still don't seem to understand. It doesn't represent the greek letter "chi" in "Xian", it is the greek letter "chi" in "Xian." It's specifically not the letter "ecks", and it's certainly not the letter "ecks" standing in for the letter "chi."
It's the greek letter pronounced as "chi." Not an "ecks" standing in for "chi."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 289 by Buzsaw, posted 12-13-2005 9:08 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 292 by Buzsaw, posted 12-13-2005 10:46 PM crashfrog has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 292 of 301 (269051)
12-13-2005 10:46 PM
Reply to: Message 291 by crashfrog
12-13-2005 9:55 PM


Re: Read Right, Ringo
Crashfrog writes:
You still don't seem to understand. It doesn't represent the greek letter "chi" in "Xian", it is the greek letter "chi" in "Xian." It's specifically not the letter "ecks", and it's certainly not the letter "ecks" standing in for the letter "chi."
It's the greek letter pronounced as "chi." Not an "ecks" standing in for "chi."
Ok Crashfrog, please specify where in this thread it has been proven that the X in Xian and Xianity has to be the Greek letter 'chi.'

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 291 by crashfrog, posted 12-13-2005 9:55 PM crashfrog has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 293 of 301 (269057)
12-13-2005 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 282 by Faith
12-13-2005 5:20 PM


Re: Buz, in the few remaining posts of this thread, let's see if we can reach resolut
Faith writes:
Sorry, I guess I overlooked much help you were receiving. I had noticed Mike the Wiz. Should have read more carefully.
Thanks Faith. My counterparts in this thread should note that not all here agree that buz is simply being a crank here. They should be put on notice that a siginificant number of the folks out there do regard it's usage unfavorably as demeaning to Christ and Christianity, regardless of whether it may have been used remotely in eons past in some fashion or another.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 282 by Faith, posted 12-13-2005 5:20 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 295 by jar, posted 12-13-2005 11:10 PM Buzsaw has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 294 of 301 (269058)
12-13-2005 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 281 by arachnophilia
12-13-2005 5:16 PM


Re: christians denigrating themselves
Arach writes:
us christians are well known for our poor self-esteem and flagelation.
so no, i don't think it's idiotic to picture christians denigrating themselves. i think we do it all the time. it's part of the salvation ritual: we admit we're worthless, stupid, and evil, and deserve to die.
Speak for yourself, Arach, me friend.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 281 by arachnophilia, posted 12-13-2005 5:16 PM arachnophilia has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 295 of 301 (269059)
12-13-2005 11:10 PM
Reply to: Message 293 by Buzsaw
12-13-2005 11:03 PM


Re: Buz, in the few remaining posts of this thread, let's see if we can reach resolut
So answer this question Buz...
why don't you simply educate those who don't know the origin of the X?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 293 by Buzsaw, posted 12-13-2005 11:03 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 297 by Buzsaw, posted 12-13-2005 11:26 PM jar has replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 296 of 301 (269063)
12-13-2005 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 279 by arachnophilia
12-13-2005 3:43 PM


Re: symptoms of the same problem
Arach writes:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you only used the X term for the violent frauds you'd at least make some sense, inserting an "X" denoting them.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We all know, for example the n word denotes blacks and that the J word denotes Japanese
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Though, it is perceived by most as denoting Christ
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
he's seriously using it as a negative. i don't mean to make fun of him or anything. but it's clearly the same problem.
Seriously, I was not using it as a negative. Try J word denotes/represents Japanese; n word denotes/represents blacks; and as denoting/representing Christ. Savvy?

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 279 by arachnophilia, posted 12-13-2005 3:43 PM arachnophilia has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 297 of 301 (269069)
12-13-2005 11:26 PM
Reply to: Message 295 by jar
12-13-2005 11:10 PM


Re: Buz, in the few remaining posts of this thread, let's see if we can reach resolut
jar writes:
So answer this question Buz...
why don't you simply educate those who don't know the origin of the X?
Why should I promote what I and multitudes of other Christians regard as a negative, regardless of how it is or ever was used. Just call Jesus the Christ, spelling it out fully and followers of Jesus the Christ Christians, spelling it out fully just as Jesus and his apostles, the originators of Christianity did in the holy text of the religion as other religions do and expect of others referring to them?

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

This message is a reply to:
 Message 295 by jar, posted 12-13-2005 11:10 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 298 by jar, posted 12-13-2005 11:28 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 300 by jar, posted 12-13-2005 11:34 PM Buzsaw has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 298 of 301 (269072)
12-13-2005 11:28 PM
Reply to: Message 297 by Buzsaw
12-13-2005 11:26 PM


Re: Buz, in the few remaining posts of this thread, let's see if we can reach resolut
Why should I promote what I and multitudes of other Christians regard as a negative, regardless of how it is or ever was used.
Because, not doing so is simply yet another example of Willfull Ignorance and also promoting Willfull Ignorance.
It really is as simple as that.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 297 by Buzsaw, posted 12-13-2005 11:26 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 299 of 301 (269073)
12-13-2005 11:30 PM


Many Thanks To All
Thanks to all, regardless of your position. We all learned something in this thread. Take care.

The immeasurable present is forever consuming the eternal future and extending the infinite past. buzsaw

jar
Member (Idle past 419 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 300 of 301 (269074)
12-13-2005 11:34 PM
Reply to: Message 297 by Buzsaw
12-13-2005 11:26 PM


Re: Buz, in the few remaining posts of this thread, let's see if we can reach resolut
Jesus and his apostles, the originators of Christianity did in the holy text of the religion as other religions do and expect of others referring to them?
Buz, you really can't be that ignorant. Jesus never spelled out Christian. And the Jews intentionally never spelled out Gd's name.
It's the history of your religion. Do you really think that it is right to intentionally keep Christians in ignorance of their own heritage just because a few Christians are ignorant of the origin and usage of the term?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 297 by Buzsaw, posted 12-13-2005 11:26 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024