Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,850 Year: 4,107/9,624 Month: 978/974 Week: 305/286 Day: 26/40 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Get Over Your Fear of Atheism
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 23 of 169 (392698)
04-01-2007 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by mpb1
04-01-2007 7:05 PM


Your extremes are so... extreme.
mpb1 writes:
So your question really has no answer because it is based on a false premise.
Wow, never new I was a false premise Maybe I don't even exist!
I've never done good deeds because I believed God told me too. And I had a very christian upbringing. When I was young, I did good because my parents told me too, and I couldn't watch TV if I didn't. Now I do good because it's the right thing to do. I want to increase the amount of good in this world, I believe good is right, and I think that one of the best ways to help make this world a better place is to do good works.
If we had righteousness in ourselves, this world would not be in the mess it is today.
That doesn't seem to follow at all. I don't think all of us have righteousness in us. But I do think that a lot of us do. Perhaps even most. That is, I don't think it's an innate sense, but that most of us have learnt righteousness. I also think it's not easy to monitor that righteousness and act in an appropriate manner. This leads us to many people ignoring it, or acting poorly. Which, of course, leaves our world in the mess it is today.
Of course, this doesn't mean there aren't those who have learnt righteousness, and monitor it and act accordingly. They just seem to end up in a minority most of the time. Or perhaps, just not very vocal.
I do agree, though, that if everyone had this righteousness and acted upon it correctly, the world would not be in this mess. Yet, being in this mess hardly means that no one is a good person, or that "we all choose to do wrong".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by mpb1, posted 04-01-2007 7:05 PM mpb1 has not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 25 of 169 (392701)
04-01-2007 7:49 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by mpb1
04-01-2007 7:30 PM


That's not good
mpb1 writes:
IF the Bible is true, then your goodness won't do you a bit of good on Judgment Day.
But, if goodness isn't good enough on Judgement Day. Then whoever's doing the judging isn't good.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by mpb1, posted 04-01-2007 7:30 PM mpb1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by mpb1, posted 04-01-2007 7:54 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 27 of 169 (392705)
04-01-2007 8:02 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by mpb1
04-01-2007 7:42 PM


Re: The Internet is for ...
mpb1 writes:
I have no problem granting that you may very well be a more more moral person - naturally - than I am.
Heh. I don't think morality is at all "natural". I think it's learnt. That is, when each of us were born (neglecting any brain abnormalities) we had the exact same potential to be the most moral people in history.
I'm sure some people get a bit of an advantage in certain maturing environments. Yet, we all have the ability to learn and change into any level of morality we would like to attain. If you can imagine being "that good", then you are capable of it. Of course, you're also capable of all the temptations you can imagine, too
So no matter how moral you or anyone else is, if the Bible is true, then all sin will be judged, and those who have not trusted in Jesus Christ as Lord and savior will receive the Judgment of God because they refused to accept the sacrifice of His Son.
That's nice. Like I said, if being good isn't good enough, then this God doing the judging isn't good. And therefore isn't worth following, or accepting anything from. If only he'd have gone to kindergarten and learnt to share...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by mpb1, posted 04-01-2007 7:42 PM mpb1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Larni, posted 04-02-2007 11:36 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 30 of 169 (392708)
04-01-2007 8:15 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by crashfrog
04-01-2007 1:57 PM


Life as an atheist
crashfrog writes:
I envision this as a thread where what it means to live as an atheist can be explored, and what, if anything, is lost or gained when the choice is made to abandon self-deception and embrace atheism.
I really don't see my life as an atheist as different from any general life. I go to work every day. I pay my bills. I try to be a good person. I screw up. I repent for screwing up.
I think about the things everyone thinks about. I think about the things theist's think about. It just seems to me, for the most part, I can replace the word "God" for "good" and any theistical thoughts or ideals transfer very neatly over to an atheistical viewpoint.
I don't know if I can pinpoint a day or time when I actually stopped believing in God. I grew up in a Catholic household. There was definitely a time when I believe in God. And now I definitely do not. I do remember a few specific epiphanies along the way. But I don't remember any sense of loss, or real gain, either. Just more of an "oh, yes, this makes more sense". And moving on.
Being an atheist really isn't that big of a part of my life. Althought I do like to discuss it here

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by crashfrog, posted 04-01-2007 1:57 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 59 of 169 (393056)
04-03-2007 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by mike the wiz
04-03-2007 10:03 AM


Re: Why I didn't become an atheist
mike the wiz writes:
I can relate to what he said, and it isn't necessarily that he is saying that atheists can me immoral, but that you don't have the burden of worrying about what God thinks of your actions, you don't have the guilt, the worry incase you sin, or the obligations, to pray etc..
Yes, I can see how this could be cause for concern. But only in a very limited, extremely narrow view.
An atheist does not have the burden of worrying about what God thinks. Yet they certainly have the burden of worrying about what their respected peers/friends/family members/loved ones think. Or even about what they themselves will think.
This certainly does cause the exact same guilt, worry, and obligations.
Not being able to open one's view and see this equality of moral motives is what actually causes concern from me.
This would tell us that the problem of holding the view that atheists can "do whatever the hell they want", isn't with theism and atheism, but more with the narrow and stifling framework that such an idea came from.
How could someone possibly believe that their God is the only source of goodwill, when there are millions of people who are living, physical proof against this? Or even the billions of people who believe that some other God is the source, and they too live extremely good lives each and every day?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by mike the wiz, posted 04-03-2007 10:03 AM mike the wiz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by GDR, posted 04-03-2007 1:41 PM Stile has replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 62 of 169 (393094)
04-03-2007 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by GDR
04-03-2007 1:41 PM


Re: Why I didn't become an atheist
GDR writes:
Stile writes:
How could someone possibly believe that their God is the only source of goodwill, when there are millions of people who are living, physical proof against this? Or even the billions of people who believe that some other God is the source, and they too live extremely good lives each and every day?
This is a strawman.
Of course it is. That's my entire point, that this line of thinking, this whole entire idea, is a strawman. I was replying to:
mike the wiz writes:
..that you [atheists] don't have the burden of worrying about what God thinks of your actions, you don't have the guilt, the worry incase you sin, or the obligations, to pray etc..
Which is, of course, a strawman. Thank-you for so explicitly pointing it out.
GDR writes:
Christianity teaches that by accepting Christ as Lord one has their conscience invigorated. This does not necessarily make him more a person of good will than his next door neighbour. The only person it should make him better than is the person he was before.
I agree. Which also proves my point (and yours) that the statement I took from mike the wiz's post was a strawman. I don't even think he meant it in the way I took it. But, as you've so graciously explained, in and of itself it certainly is a strawman.
...
strawman
...
Just thought that maybe we needed to use the buzzwords, or something

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by GDR, posted 04-03-2007 1:41 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by GDR, posted 04-03-2007 2:24 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied
 Message 64 by mike the wiz, posted 04-03-2007 3:11 PM Stile has replied

  
Stile
Member
Posts: 4295
From: Ontario, Canada
Joined: 12-02-2004


Message 65 of 169 (393119)
04-03-2007 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by mike the wiz
04-03-2007 3:11 PM


Re: Why I didn't become an atheist
mike the wiz writes:
Like Donald duck proves that ducks can talk.
Stile, are you acting a stool?
I, uh... don't know if you're joking around, or insulting me
If you want to talk about something, it would help if you were a bit more specific.
I understand that these last few posts were confusing. I took a certain point from your post out of context and dealt with it on it's own... GDR did the same thing with one of my points... are you now doing the same thing to complete the circle?
Again, if there's anything you feel I mis-represented, let's talk about it. If not, and you're just having fun... uh... *high fives*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by mike the wiz, posted 04-03-2007 3:11 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by mike the wiz, posted 04-03-2007 6:10 PM Stile has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024