First requirement is "Believe."
So I should think that it's true, and then and only then should I find out what it says. And then whatever it says, I should go on thinking that it's true.
Well by that procedure, you could believe any dumb crap no matter how counterfactual and self-contradictory. And indeed, it's a procedure that one would only want to apply if one wanted to have a good chance of believing something false. No-one sincerely wanting the truth would have anything to do with it.
One question that occurs to me is how you picked the text to which to apply this strange method of non-critical analysis. Why the Bible and not
Alice In Wonderland? It can't have been through reading it and
becoming convinced that it was true, because apparently one has to be convinced of that before one reads it --- otherwise one ends up like me, thinking that it's a load of old cobblers.
God does not change, He is the same yesterday today and forever, but IN RELATION TO HUMAN BEINGS He seems to change, such as changing His mind about punishing us if we repent of what He was going to punish us for and that sort of thing. Or by granting our prayers. That's the kind of thing that is put in our terms.
So, is it true or false to say that God changed his mind?
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.