Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,817 Year: 4,074/9,624 Month: 945/974 Week: 272/286 Day: 33/46 Hour: 5/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Empirical Evidence for Evolution
mark24
Member (Idle past 5222 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 27 of 60 (912)
12-18-2001 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by John Paul
12-18-2001 9:56 AM


quote:
Originally posted by John Paul:
What limits body builders from lifting more & more weight? What limits runners from breaking the sound barrier?

Only being able to increase muscle mass a couple of 10s of percents.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by John Paul:
Why in all the millions (if not billions) of observed bacterial generations have we not observed bacteria evolving into anything but bacteria? Why does a virus ALWAYS remain a virus?
[/B][/QUOTE]
Possible answer. An organism today has to overcome environmental pressures to evolve from niche a to niche b. In the pre-Cambrian fewer environmental pressures existed, so macro evolution was met with less failure.
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by John Paul, posted 12-18-2001 9:56 AM John Paul has not replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5222 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 37 of 60 (1141)
12-23-2001 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by John Paul
12-20-2001 10:06 AM


quote:
Originally posted by John Paul:

John Paul:
Common mechanism can also explain shared retro-viral insetrtions and pseudogenes.

1/ Given 6,000 years in which to do it, how?
2/ & just how?
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by John Paul, posted 12-20-2001 10:06 AM John Paul has not replied

mark24
Member (Idle past 5222 days)
Posts: 3857
From: UK
Joined: 12-01-2001


Message 42 of 60 (1344)
12-28-2001 2:57 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by nator
12-27-2001 11:06 PM


Yup, sorry Brad, I must join those who simply don't have a clue what your on about. I'm sure there should be some punctuation going on. That people spell poorly is irrelevant to me, as long as I understand them. But I have to draw the line at the induced asphyxia of a loooooooong sentence, sans commas. It's very hard to read, mate.
------------------
Occam's razor is not for shaving with.
[This message has been edited by mark24, 12-28-2001]
[This message has been edited by mark24, 12-28-2001]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by nator, posted 12-27-2001 11:06 PM nator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024