Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,789 Year: 4,046/9,624 Month: 917/974 Week: 244/286 Day: 5/46 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why must we believe *before* we die?
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 286 of 302 (251421)
10-13-2005 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 285 by iano
10-13-2005 7:54 AM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
Okay.
Is God vainglorious?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 285 by iano, posted 10-13-2005 7:54 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 287 by iano, posted 10-13-2005 12:16 PM jar has replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1967 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 287 of 302 (251440)
10-13-2005 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 286 by jar
10-13-2005 11:10 AM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
jar writes:
Is God vainglorious?
(Assuming the same human limits as previouly noted) Nope
(But I certainly can be. Demonstration of the fall perhaps)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 11:10 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 288 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 12:20 PM iano has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 288 of 302 (251442)
10-13-2005 12:20 PM
Reply to: Message 287 by iano
10-13-2005 12:16 PM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
Okay, so far God is not stupid and not vainglorious.
If those are true, why would a God set the bar for salvation beyond human capabilities or require folk to worship Her as a prerequisite for salvation?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 287 by iano, posted 10-13-2005 12:16 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 289 by iano, posted 10-13-2005 1:19 PM jar has replied
 Message 290 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 1:23 PM jar has replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1967 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 289 of 302 (251452)
10-13-2005 1:19 PM
Reply to: Message 288 by jar
10-13-2005 12:20 PM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
jar writes:
Okay, so far God is not stupid and not vainglorious.
If those are true, why would a God set the bar for salvation beyond human capabilities or require folk to worship Her as a prerequisite for salvation?
That appear logical in and of itself. You could have asked a few more questions to make it appear even more so. But I get the point to whit: it makes no sense that God would set the bar at too high a standard to be hopped over. But only in the context of the assumption that hopping over the bar was the way it worked(I haven't said that worship is a prequisite to salvation either. It isn't.)
But the height of the bar is only one half of a two half game - both of which are amply covered in the Bible. Lets look at what would happen if the bar was deliberately set too high. Look at it with a view to the process applied to a person who is going to be saved
A man sins.
A man realises his sin. he may feel guilt, shame etc. he will try
not to repeat the behaviour. He fails again, and again, and again. He buries the guilt, he makes excuses for himself. He may rid the deed from his mind. But not from his heart.
All the while God is pressing his standard: perfect adherence to the law.
The man, under the action of the Holy Spirit, feels more and more guilty, more and more shame. More condemned by this standard he knows he is falling short of. It piles up within him. He can't escape from it
Eventually he arrives at the point of the man at the end of Roman 7. "Oh wretched man that I am - who will deliver me from this body of death" He realised what he is. A filthy sinner before a totally righteous God. He's even got Jesus as a standard to compare himself to. Jesus who never ever sinned.
It's at this point that the perfect, unattainable law has done it's work. It's very existance and perfection has proved an insurmountable barrier to the man. He had tried but he realises he may as well be throwing ball bearings at an ocean liner as fulfill the law. His own, self-achieved rightstanding with God, his own righteousness..."are as filthy rags". He is bankrupt before God. Sinners go to Hell. He is going to Hell. And he knows it...and he agrees that that is all he is fit for. He had no right to meet a righteous God. Filth and righteous cannot live together.
When a man reaches this point God steps in. The man needs righteousness, but can't obtain it himself. "But now a righteousness FROM GOD is revealed...which is by faith". God has enough righteousness to give to all. But he can only give it to someone who recognised their need of it. The horse has been broken. It has broken itself. Against the perfect law. Only then can the proper, as-designed relationship begin. Man needing God, Man son to God, Man off the throne, God in his rightful place in mans life - on the throne.
Any other form of salvation: going to church, doing deeds, giving money to the poor, praying, reading the bible, joining a religion, denying self, attempting to live up to the law....puts salvation in mans hands. It keeps man dependant on himself.
Man is helpless. The perfectness of the Law is designed to show him that.
(p.s. for interested lurkers, if any. The process whereby this occurs will vary from person to person. It will occur without them being aware of it being God-connected. But at some point they need to need God, realise it and ask him, as the only one who can, to help. And he will. As God is my witness...)
This message has been edited by iano, 13-Oct-2005 06:29 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 288 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 12:20 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 291 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 1:26 PM iano has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 290 of 302 (251453)
10-13-2005 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 288 by jar
10-13-2005 12:20 PM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
Okay, so far God is not stupid and not vainglorious
What I don't understand--in regard to God's "logic"--is why it was necessary to sacrifice HIs only begotten Son in order to save mankind. If He was going to let us off, why didn't He just do so?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 288 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 12:20 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 293 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 1:41 PM robinrohan has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 291 of 302 (251454)
10-13-2005 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 289 by iano
10-13-2005 1:19 PM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
That is certainly one point of view.
But again it presupposes that GOD has some need, some urge, for mere humans to realize that they can only be saved by GOD's actions.
Why?
Why would GOD have a need such as that? Is GOD so vainglorious that he needs some confirmation of his might and position?
I don't believe so.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 289 by iano, posted 10-13-2005 1:19 PM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 292 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 1:29 PM jar has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 292 of 302 (251455)
10-13-2005 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 291 by jar
10-13-2005 1:26 PM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
But again it presupposes that GOD has some need, some urge, for mere humans to realize that they can only be saved by GOD's actions.
He craves our belief in Him in order to convince Himself of His own existence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 291 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 1:26 PM jar has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 293 of 302 (251457)
10-13-2005 1:41 PM
Reply to: Message 290 by robinrohan
10-13-2005 1:23 PM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
Again, I can only speak from my personal prospective.
I believe that Jesus life was the biggest sacrifice if we're talking along those lines. And it's a message, a telegram.
I believe GOD did let mankind off, with NO conditions, that Salvation is freely granted to all.
But we're not all that bright on the whole. GOD is still trying to find ways for us to get the message.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 1:23 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 294 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 1:46 PM jar has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 294 of 302 (251460)
10-13-2005 1:46 PM
Reply to: Message 293 by jar
10-13-2005 1:41 PM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
I believe that Jesus life was the biggest sacrifice if we're talking along those lines
There's an ancient tradition, I believe, that the sacrifice of Jesus was a ransom paid to the Devil.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 293 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 1:41 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 295 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 1:56 PM robinrohan has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 295 of 302 (251464)
10-13-2005 1:56 PM
Reply to: Message 294 by robinrohan
10-13-2005 1:46 PM


Re: Everybody saved, 'cept maybe Christians
Not familar with that one. But Biblical tradition considers Satan as but one tool of GOD and that Satan serves only GOD's purposes.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 294 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 1:46 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 296 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 2:09 PM jar has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 296 of 302 (251468)
10-13-2005 2:09 PM
Reply to: Message 295 by jar
10-13-2005 1:56 PM


ransom
"Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister and to give his life a ransom for many." Matt 20:28
The word "ransom" is used again in this context in I Tim.2:6
This is out of K. James version.
This message has been edited by robinrohan, 10-13-2005 01:09 PM
This message has been edited by robinrohan, 10-13-2005 01:10 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 295 by jar, posted 10-13-2005 1:56 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 297 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 2:17 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 298 by Legend, posted 10-13-2005 2:49 PM robinrohan has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 297 of 302 (251474)
10-13-2005 2:17 PM
Reply to: Message 296 by robinrohan
10-13-2005 2:09 PM


Re: ransom
"The first suggestion was articulated by the second-century Irenaeus of Lyons. He argued that Jesus was paid as a ransom to the devil. Specifically, so the theory goes, Christ was paid as a ransom to the devil to free people's souls. This was a clever ruse on God's part, however, for unknown to the devil, Jesus was actually God Himself. Unable to constrain Jesus' divine soul, the devil was defeated and Christ emerged victorious. This view, known as the "Ransom" or "Classic" theory, was taught consistently by nearly all of the Church Fathers, including Augustine"
I got this off a website entitled "The Meaning of the Atonement."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 2:09 PM robinrohan has not replied

Legend
Member (Idle past 5032 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 298 of 302 (251484)
10-13-2005 2:49 PM
Reply to: Message 296 by robinrohan
10-13-2005 2:09 PM


Re: ransom
Just to put this into perspective, the word 'ransom' (Greek: 'lytron') was used at the time to denote the money a slave paid to his master in exchange for his freedom.
So the questions that need to be asked, In Jesus' case, are:
- Who paid the ransom ?
- Who received it?
- Who was set free ?

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 2:09 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 299 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 2:58 PM Legend has replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 299 of 302 (251486)
10-13-2005 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 298 by Legend
10-13-2005 2:49 PM


Re: ransom
Who paid the ransom ?
- Who received it?
- Who was set free ?
According to the ancient tradition, God paid the ransom to the Devil to free mankind.
About a thousand years later (according to the website I mentioned) the concept begin to shift to the idea that God paid the ransom to Himself. According to this view, I guess it's kind of like what people say about the national debt: "We owe it to ourselves."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 298 by Legend, posted 10-13-2005 2:49 PM Legend has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 300 by Legend, posted 10-13-2005 4:53 PM robinrohan has replied

Legend
Member (Idle past 5032 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 300 of 302 (251511)
10-13-2005 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 299 by robinrohan
10-13-2005 2:58 PM


Re: ransom
robinrohan writes:
According to the ancient tradition, God paid the ransom to the Devil to free mankind.
that would suggest that God and/or Jesus is subordinate to the Devil.
robinrohan writes:
About a thousand years later (according to the website I mentioned) the concept begin to shift to the idea that God paid the ransom to Himself. According to this view, I guess it's kind of like what people say about the national debt: "We owe it to ourselves."
ah yes, the old "God killed himself to appease himself..." adage.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 299 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 2:58 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 301 by robinrohan, posted 10-13-2005 5:53 PM Legend has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024