Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,480 Year: 3,737/9,624 Month: 608/974 Week: 221/276 Day: 61/34 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Jared v. Hovind
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 3 of 60 (248941)
10-04-2005 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by arachnophilia
10-04-2005 6:44 PM


hoag hovind 4 (hovind 2 hoag zero)
At the 80% point hoag is not managing to handle Hovind well at all.
Dropped the ball on bird transitionals then let Hovind get away with you can't say "they had kids" to drop the whales discussion.
Then got caught up in science is religion and lost his way there too.
Not good so far.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by arachnophilia, posted 10-04-2005 6:44 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by arachnophilia, posted 10-04-2005 7:21 PM NosyNed has replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 5 of 60 (248956)
10-04-2005 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by arachnophilia
10-04-2005 7:21 PM


hoag hovind 12 (hovind 2 or more hoag zero)
I'm at the half way point
Hovind is getting away with fossils date rocks and rocks date fossils, he seemed to deflect everything on Shermer.
I'm still listening.
Hovind seems to have brought up Mt, Chief and Matterhorn as disproof of geologic column.
This message has been edited by NosyNed, 10-04-2005 07:41 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by arachnophilia, posted 10-04-2005 7:21 PM arachnophilia has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Yaro, posted 10-04-2005 8:15 PM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024