Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 83 (9005 total)
59 online now:
CosmicChimp, PaulK, PurpleYouko, Stile (4 members, 55 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Upcoming Birthdays: AdminPhat
Post Volume: Total: 881,038 Year: 12,786/23,288 Month: 511/1,527 Week: 190/207 Day: 12/39 Hour: 0/1

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Are You an Authoritarian?
Member (Idle past 1553 days)
Posts: 504
From: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Joined: 03-22-2004

Message 36 of 181 (501839)
03-08-2009 4:17 AM

Bob Altemeyer
I am so thankful that Altemeyer's work has been reposted. I have subsequently bought two of his other books and downloaded the studies he has done. The man has done some of the most important work in modern sociology. This a response that is typical (from our local paper):

publiusweb writes:

I took your bait. Your Dr. Bob sounds like a typical liberal reactionary. His test is stupid and biased and an insult to conservatives.

What I find amazing about Altemeyer's work is that is rare to find (imo) psychological studies using hard statistics. When you examine his stats there lies the argument. His test, the whole of his research could be bullshit, but then you have to explain the correlations. Why do those who score high on the RWA scale also have these traits? Like the logic test I mentioned earlier on another thread, these should not be correlated with the RWA score but they are. Fascinating research!

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Larni, posted 03-08-2009 7:56 AM Lithodid-Man has responded

Member (Idle past 1553 days)
Posts: 504
From: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Joined: 03-22-2004

Message 53 of 181 (501970)
03-09-2009 2:41 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by Larni
03-08-2009 7:56 AM

Psychology and Statistics
Larni and Percy,

I am completely sorry and retract my statement. It is a good example of how important it is for me to critically examine my opinions and beliefs, especially before airing them publicly. As a 'hard' science major I have taken it as a given that psychological sciences were weak on scientific rigor. I have not, however, based that on actual evidence but a composite of notions and opinions garnered over time. This is the very definition of unfair bias and bigotry. I will watch myself in the future, so thank you both for pointing this out.

Doctor Bashir: "Of all the stories you told me, which were true and which weren't?"
Elim Garak: "My dear Doctor, they're all true"
Doctor Bashir: "Even the lies?"
Elim Garak: "Especially the lies"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Larni, posted 03-08-2009 7:56 AM Larni has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Larni, posted 03-09-2009 4:32 AM Lithodid-Man has not yet responded
 Message 55 by Percy, posted 03-09-2009 6:42 AM Lithodid-Man has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020