Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 79 (8961 total)
371 online now:
AZPaul3, caffeine, DrJones*, jar, JonF, Meddle, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Stile, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat) (10 members, 361 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 869,402 Year: 1,150/23,288 Month: 1,150/1,851 Week: 274/320 Day: 46/87 Hour: 1/17

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed - Science Under Attack
Posts: 176
From: Scotland
Joined: 05-08-2006

Message 61 of 438 (444680)
12-30-2007 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by Hyroglyphx
12-29-2007 6:59 PM

Re: My Personal Reaction
As for ID when it comes to filling in gaps, no one uses God as a filler, unless it used generically.

But then does 'a designer did it' add anything that is scientifically constructive? For example look at the bacterial flagellum as an often cited example of an IC system. Could you give IDs scientific explanation of the origins of this structure?

In a quick general question, when do you think a designer stopped designing, allowing evolutionary processes to take over, and how did you conclude this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-29-2007 6:59 PM Hyroglyphx has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020