Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 57 (9174 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: Neptune7
Post Volume: Total: 917,606 Year: 4,863/9,624 Month: 211/427 Week: 21/103 Day: 1/9 Hour: 0/1

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Links for the Creation/Evolution Controversy (not a debate topic)
Posts: 6420
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.1

Message 51 of 147 (575279)
08-19-2010 9:49 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by Minnemooseus
08-19-2010 3:36 AM

Re: A couple of interesting articles (quote mining / non-believing clergy)
Thus I can't check if the above links are still good.
Yes, the links are still good.
On the first link, I mostly agree with Jason Rosenhouse, though he might be mistaken about whether the ID folk are actually lying (telling deliberate untruths). Perhaps I give them too much benefit of the doubt, but it seems to me that honestly do believe that they see a hand of design in whatever they look at. So when they selectively quote, the intention might not be to misrepresent (though that is the effect). The intention might be to pick out what they see as the most important issues. That is, it may mostly a matter on confirmation bias, rather than intentional misrepresentation.
The second link was one that I thought very interesting. At that time, I actually started a discussion thread at DreamCatcher, but it seems that nobody else found it interesting enough to join the discussion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-19-2010 3:36 AM Minnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Minnemooseus, posted 08-19-2010 9:32 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024