Pick and Choose Fundamentalism

If you're going to quote great swaths of the Bible, how about giving a citation?Romans 2:17-3:31

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

What's wrong with it being a myth? What's wrong with the whole Bible being a fabrication? If they fabricated the "God told us to do it" part, how do you know which other parts are (not) fabricated?

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

I'm asking: if the whole story (or most of it) was fabricated, what would be the problem with that? How would it effect your beliefs?Are there some parts that are "deal breakers", that would destroy your faith if they weren't literally true? If so, how do you pick and choose which bits are allowed to be myth/metaphor and which are not?Edited by Ringo, : Added emphasis.

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

I can see I'm not using enough boldface. I asked: HOW do you pick and choose which bits are allowed to be myth/metaphor and which are not?I'm trying to find a difference between a Christian who claims the earth must be 6000 years old and a Christian who claims Jesus must have risen from the dead.I'm not asking for empty opinions. I'm asking for self-awareness.

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

What scientific or historical evidence applies to the resurrection of Jesus? What does the resurrection have to do with His message of love?

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

I'm glad you're so well-appraised about my perspective. But, yet again, you haven't answered the question. Of course His death (and more importantly, His life) can be seen as and example of self-sacrificing love. I'm asking about the resurrection.What is it that makes the resurrection a deal-breaker for you? Why is it that the Genesis account can be taken as metaphor/fiction/typo and the resurrection accounts can not? If a large event (creation) can be fictionalized, why not a small one (resurrection)?

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

Again, Jesus' life (and death) are "evidence of a God that cared enough and loved enough to continue to interact with the creatures he created in his image". I don't see that resurrection has anything to do with it. What's the problem with that, though? The topic isn't about why you prefer Christianity to Judaism or some other brand of theism. It's about why you pick and choose certain parts of the Bible as being "fundamental", while other parts are not. Yes. Nor can there be much doubt that Frodo believed the ring was magic. The question is: Why do you have to buy into the magic ring to get anything out of the story?

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

But there are plenty of faiths that don't rely on a resurrection of any kind. The question still remains: Why does removing the resurrection make it cease to be Christianity but removing the literal six-day creation doesn't?

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place”
-- Joseph Goebbels
-------------
Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

I don't think that's an example of pick-and-choose fundamentalism. They believe the people deserved to be slaughtered - because God said so. We've seen fundamentalists argue that right here.Their position is perverted but not inconsistent.

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels

The OP asks specifically why fundamentalists believe Genesis literally but don't obey the levitical law literally. That's picking and choosing which parts of the Bible they take literally.They do take the slaughter stories literally, even if they can't explain why the slaughter was justified.The excuse for eating pork or shellfish is "Jesus put an end to all that" - which they can't explain either. Your example is in the same category: things that were changed by Jesus. Jesus made slaughter bad and crabs good. Insane but consistent.The Genesis literalism, as per the OP, is different. No good or bad, just happened or didn't happen.

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels

I hear what you're saying. But you seem to be contradicting yourself when you say: If "everyone in the city was a sinner", what are they picking and choosing? They don't talk about the specifics of each person's sin because they don't know any specifics. They can surmise the probable sins of some (adults) but not of others (children).Not knowing is not the same as picking and choosing. It's the God-moves-in-mysterious-ways defense, which is not peculiar to fundamentalists. Most Christians use it at one level or another.It's no more on-topic than picking and choosing a flavour of ice cream.

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels

That's not a fact at all, as far as fundies are concerned. Because of The Fall™, they believe that "all have sinned and come short of the glory of God". Many of them do believe that infants are sinners from birth. Oh for @#$% sake, don't you start with the macro/micro crap. As I've tried to explain, not knowing the answer to a question isn't necessarily ignoring it. Again, you're ignoring how fundies actually view sin: according to them, we're all born sinful. No action is necessary to make us "worthy of death". Again, not answering a question is not an example of picking and choosing which parts of the Bible to believe. Remember that fundies are supposed to have God whispering profound truths in their shell-like ears at all times. They're embarassed when there's something they don't know. If you don't like the all-have-sinned defense and God doesn't give them a better one, they fall back on the chirping-crickets defense.Again, incompleteness is not inconsistency.The topic is about inconsistency of fundie belief and practice, not about refusing to cave in to your interrogation. While I'm at it, why don't I find you an honest man, Diogenes? If a fundie ever gave a straightforwrd answer to any question, it would be a bloody miracle. I already have this one. Edited by Ringo, : Changed "practise" --> "practice". Not sure if it's right, but it looks better.

---

“Faith moves mountains, but only knowledge moves them to the right place” -- Joseph Goebbels