Fulfilled Prophecy

jesus was a pretty damn common name back before the first century ad, now no one names thier kid jesus, at least not in our culture, because they think its special when its not. christ is a title not a name, depite how we use it, its an english translation of a greek word from a hebrew word
and immanuel means god is with us, not god with us, its a sign to ahaz that god was supporting him, not that god was really a human!no matthew says his name will be JESUS and someone tacked on the immanuel part at the end to give the prophecy some legitimacy
and if the part about immanuel is about a virgin birth then there were two virgin births because a verse or two later it talks about the birth no, it says right there in the text, it will be a sign of gods backing of ahaz, via the birth of this child, it says it right there in isaiah, you can't twist it any other way.
he can't be the messiah he's not the son of anyone decended from david, his mother doesn't countm even if he was a blood reletive to joseph, the curse would count he's not exempt from the curse since he would be fully human!
where do you get the idea that jesus would be exempt? he has to be related to joseph to be the messiah and joseph makes him unable to be messiah, and he's not blood related to joseph anyway, but the "son" of god, which makes him unable to be messiah anywaythe thing is theres nothing to stand on that would allow jesus to be messiah, no matter how much logical twisting you do

don't you mean on reservations?

yes and the KJV is a corrupt translation and tries to perpetulate lies sorry you are just wrong and so is the KJV, its a bad translation of a translation
http://www.biblicalresources.info/pages/isaiah/immanuel.html
a nice explaination of what it means
Isaiah 8:10 ("Take counsel together, but it will come to nothing; Speak the word, but it will not stand, For God is with us").
and the child is of isaiah not ahaz, he would be a sign from god, that god is with ahaz and israel aganst his foes why is this even relevent? its just a bunch of scripture glued togathe and renders it meaningless without context why is this relevent? thats nice but 'god is with us' is what immanuel means, are you going to argue with a whole nation of people who know thier own nameing convention and 4 thousand years of biblical history? did i say anyone couldn't god created us, we are all sons of god or daughters as well, of course people need to explain to me how jesus is the only son of god, since theres a lot of people called son of god in the bible

no, they were the mouth piece of god, what you are doing is equating being a prophit with being an oracle, which not the same, a person saying "god will do this in one year", is not the same as saying "you will find wealth or great fortue or be blessed" god is tell prophets what he wants people to dothe problem is prophets are not oracles as the christians want to think they are, yes some prophecies might be for the future, not its not very far in the future and it impacted the prophets life time the apolgetic ones are, the ones that believe the OT is about jesus are, that the NT is a conteniuation of the OT are