gasby:
If anything, we should lay the blame on the writing style of the past. In this day and age, we communicate with each other directly without beating around the bushes.
It's not a past-present thing so much. Surrealism has always been with us, and so have literal mindsets. I'd flip this. The blame lies with the mentality that seeks linear meanings in complex symbols.
Surrealism has its value.
Alice in Wonderland is an evocative, fascinating book. One can find new meanings (and amusement) in its images throughout one's life. But it is not the book to consult if you're in a car trying to navigate the UK. One can't get to Glasgow from Sussex by driving your car down a rabbit hole.
One can say 'Oh, I know the rabbit hole is not
literal. I'm not that naive. I understand the rabbit hole is a symbol. It is necessary for me to
interpret the rabbit hole correctly so I will understand what highway it
means for me to take.'
Playing that game is not likely to get one to Glasgow in short order, either. One is better off throwing
Wonderland in the back seat for a while and consulting a map.
Surrealism is complex by nature. It deals in multilayered symbols that speak to the unconscious mind at least as much as the consicous mind. Its symbols represent whole constellations of things. Surrealist art is not code of the linear '1 = A, 2 = B' sort.
But maps are. Maps are simple. They are meant to be read in linear fashion: this graphic equals a two-lane highway, this one a four-lane highway, this color a toll road. 1 = A, 2 = B, item for item. Code.
Reading a complex work as a linear one guarantees that the interpreter will miss the destination before pulling away from the curb.
The complexity of symbols is an important
reason why surrealist works fascinate people so much. It's why highly symbolic forms of expression retain power long after a map issued on the same date becomes obsolete. But it's also why linear interpreters can churn out one idea after another over generations. Countless layers can fuel countless simplistic interpretations.
This also explains why would-be prophecy interpreters are so bad at actually predicting anything... but so very good at coming along after an event and pointing to a passage and saying 'See--this was all foretold!'
____
Archer
All species are transitional.