Hi guys, good debate so far, but there seems to be an impasse, let me see if I can help.
For RAZD I think the issue is that the debate has changed topic from the age of the earth. In its place have arisen two other topics: a) whether physical laws have remained unchanged over at least the past 6000 years or so. As this is a scientific topic it seems well suited for you. And b) whether the Bible provides support for Simple's proposals. Biblical support for creationist positions is perhaps a less appealing topic for you.
For Simple, since it has been agreed that Biblical and religious arguments are permitted, the issue for you is only a matter of presenting support for a different set of physical laws prior to the flood, and this can of course include Biblical and religious support as well as support from the natural world.
| ||EvC Forum Director|