Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,411 Year: 3,668/9,624 Month: 539/974 Week: 152/276 Day: 26/23 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   There you Go,YECs...biblical "evidence" of "flat earth beliefs"
Karl_but_not_THAT_Karl
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 243 (9426)
05-09-2002 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by w_fortenberry
05-09-2002 2:35 AM


quote:
Originally posted by w_fortenberry:
b)Correct, yet that CBR, in traveling to us across the universe is affected by the universe so evenly that our measurements of it never vary by more than one part in ten thousand. Thus some have assumed that the universe looks basically the same regardless of the direction or even the locality from which it is viewed. Please notice that I do not agree with this assumption.

You seem to be ingnoring the overall anisotropy of the CBR. Conklin in 1969 described the dipole variation in the CBR due to the proper motion of the solar system at a velocity of 370km/sec.
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmoall.htm#LSS

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by w_fortenberry, posted 05-09-2002 2:35 AM w_fortenberry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by w_fortenberry, posted 05-10-2002 1:02 AM Karl_but_not_THAT_Karl has not replied

  
Karl_but_not_THAT_Karl
Inactive Member


Message 64 of 243 (9491)
05-10-2002 6:19 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by joz
05-10-2002 11:57 AM


quote:
Originally posted by joz:
But I think you will agree that anything that is measured as moving relative to the universe cannot be at the center of that universe....
Bye bye geocentricity and even Heliocentricity/milkywaycentricity of the universe....
Feel free to show mathmaticaly how you feel nearly homogenous CBR suggests a spherical plane...

Smoots in 1977 presents a much better detection of the first order anisotropy.
http://prola.aps.org/pdf/PRL/v39/i14/p898_1
Sorry, just realized this link doesn't work outside the firewall. The reference is: {Smoots, et. al., 1977, Physical Review Letters, 39, 898}
[This message has been edited by Karl_but_not_THAT_Karl, 05-12-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by joz, posted 05-10-2002 11:57 AM joz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024