EXACTLY MY POINT!!!! All the places such as the ruins of the ancient city of Jericho...can be fount, ALL the cities such as BABYLON, EGYPT...and so forth, all the events are also mentioned by other civilizations such as the FLOOD....etc.
So sorry to break it to you, but the fact that place existed, doesn't give evidence for an event, that would be like me saying "england exists so that must mean that Arthur must have existed just as mort d'Arthur said!" most logical people would look at me like I needed help,
"That Palestine and the Semites early brought a significant influence to bear upon Egypt is clear from Semitic traces in the LANGUAGE of the Nile country.
Well just to ask, do you believe that semite=Jew?, or Hebrew?
the arabs are semites, a lot of people are semites, not just the hebrews, despite what media says.
However, this may be, under Ramesses II, the Hebrews (according to the Bible) or the 'Habiru (according to the hieroglyphic texts) took part in the great works ordered by the Pharaoh, which were indeed 'forced labour'. (in the dictionary of the hieroglyphic language by Ranke.
link of this please, I am interested in this, but I'm not sure i can agree with you, till i get a link or something
Yes, Egyptian history speak of the ancient Hebrews...and guess what...SO DOES THE B-I-B-L-E. It is Jewish HISTORY.
where does it say this in eyptian history? till you provide evidence, it is speculation.
JUST AS THERE WAS A ACTUAL "RAMESES" TO EGYPT....THERE WAS A MOSES TO ISRAEL!
Really? you mean theres no statues to rameses? no records of his reign, no monuments? please post something other than speculation