Can you explain some thigns that are puzzling me.
1) Why do you think Nebraska man, a mistake which was corrected after only a few years - and that long ago - is still taught as fact in schools ?
To the best of my knowledge the "Nebraska man" designation only appeared in the popular media and while it is possible that a teacher at the time could have used that material I have never heard of it appearing in any textbook, even back then.
(I also note that Baugh has made at least one similar - and probably worse mistake - identifying a fossil fish tooth as human)
2) Why do you think that Ballards research into the filling of the Black Sea basin is evidence of a global flood ? Ballard himself does not think so - the only relation to the story of Noah is the idea that the story originated with the flooding of the area now under the Black Sea - a local flood.
3) The chariot wheels in Aqaba are one of Ron Wyatt's "discoveries". Even Answers in Genesis consider Wyatt to be highly untrustworthy.
4) The modern coelocanths are not the fossil species. The prehistoric coelocanths are NOT around. Why do you think that they are ?