Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-20-2019 4:16 PM
31 online now:
edge, jar, kjsimons, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Sarah Bellum, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat) (7 members, 24 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: anglagard
Post Volume:
Total: 857,188 Year: 12,224/19,786 Month: 2,005/2,641 Week: 514/708 Day: 73/135 Hour: 4/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Claims of God Being Omnipotent in the Bible
custard
Inactive Member


Message 163 of 381 (188032)
02-24-2005 5:12 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by arachnophilia
02-23-2005 2:31 AM


Re: answer: an intelligent person. sometimes.
arachnophilia writes:

even with my belief in christ, i reject whole-heartedly the gospel of john (as blasphemy) and the letters of the apostle paul.

Whoa, really? That piques my curiosity!

Quick question, why is the gospel of John blasphemy. Short answer works for me. Thanks! :)


This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by arachnophilia, posted 02-23-2005 2:31 AM arachnophilia has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by arachnophilia, posted 02-25-2005 12:19 AM custard has not yet responded

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 174 of 381 (188653)
02-26-2005 5:01 AM
Reply to: Message 173 by arachnophilia
02-26-2005 4:23 AM


Re: Wise as Serpents
arach writes:

do we see the double standard here? why is the book of mormon not ok, but say the new testament is? they line about with the ot about as well.

Or the gnostic gospels, or the gospel according to Biff.

Seriously, I can't stand that argument about which chapters were TRULY inspired and which weren't.

xevo writes:

There were many criteria which were involved in the determination of whether or not they were inspired texts.

What would those be? Were they peer reviewed by religious scholars?Could you please post a link to these criteria?

This message has been edited by custard, 02-26-2005 05:02 AM


This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by arachnophilia, posted 02-26-2005 4:23 AM arachnophilia has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 176 by arachnophilia, posted 02-27-2005 1:41 AM custard has not yet responded
 Message 178 by xevolutionist, posted 02-27-2005 2:13 AM custard has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019