|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Were there Dinosaurs in the Bible? | |||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1489 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
I would like to ask you what distinguishes Buzsaw's post from trolling? He's still here, I guess.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 416 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
And yet you failed to justify that stance when it came down to the Biblical reference. LOL You would perhaps like Biblical references on why the Bible should be taken figuratively? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1489 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
There's a suite of characters that are considered reptilian, brain case structure, jaw structure, etc. it's not just eggs & scales. Dinosaurs are in possession of as many reptile characters as the next reptile. So, hypothetically, if that suite had, for instance, 8 characters, how many would an organism have to have to fall under that classification? 7? 5? 2? Is that how it works?
It's less objective than the cladistic system, IMHO. I guess I can see the subjectivity in determining what group consistutes a clade, but it seems like determining who is in the clade is a lot less subjective.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9003 From: Canada Joined: |
True enough. We'll see.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
mark24 Member (Idle past 5217 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: |
crashfrog,
So, hypothetically, if that suite had, for instance, 8 characters, how many would an organism have to have to fall under that classification? 7? 5? 2? Is that how it works? An excellent question that deserves an equally good answer. Mark There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
|
|||||||||||||||||||
sidelined Member (Idle past 5930 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
buzsaw
I am sory that I have not kept up on this thread so pardon me if I ask just what your hypothesis states.Could you also clarify what the mechanism that produced the changes would be?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
dpardo Inactive Member |
Yaro said:
"These are not dinosaurs, but actually well documented mythological beasts predominant in middleastern mythology from babylon to persia. To say they are dinosaurs is preposterous." Yaro, if some cultures mention Behemoth or Leviathan in their writings does that make them mythological?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
NosyNed Member Posts: 9003 From: Canada Joined: |
Yaro, if some cultures mention Behemoth or Leviathan in their writings does that make them mythological? I'd say what makes them mythological is no evidence other than the writings to suggest that the creatures exist or existed. Are you suggesting that everything mentioned in any cultures writings qualify as potentially real? I think most of us would accept that some such creatures may be based on stories of real animals but there would have to be some real evidence for anything beyond that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Nighttrain Member (Idle past 4015 days) Posts: 1512 From: brisbane,australia Joined: |
In the Ozarks, we call all critters without laigs a 'reptile.'
`Cept fer them revenooers.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
I am sory that I have not kept up on this thread so pardon me if I ask just what your hypothesis states.Could you also clarify what the mechanism that produced the changes would be? No problem. Go to message 7, page 1 and message 101 page 7 If it's not clear get back to me. This message has been edited by buzsaw, 08-21-2004 06:42 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||
AdminNosy Administrator Posts: 4754 From: Vancouver, BC, Canada Joined: |
When refering to other msgs you can use the msg tag. You can see all of it in the UBB codes to the left of the edit screen.
Here is an example
Message 7 Using the raw text button will show how it is done. This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 08-21-2004 07:24 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||
lfen Member (Idle past 4699 days) Posts: 2189 From: Oregon Joined: |
but doesn't the fact it has a navel mean that whatever the creature is, it is a placental mammal and not a reptile/lizard/dinosaur ? Very perceptive! I'm no expert but I've been around snakes and turtles and they don't have navels, neither do fish or birds. Excellent point.This critter whatever it was was a placental mammal and NOT a dinosaur. lfen
|
|||||||||||||||||||
lfen Member (Idle past 4699 days) Posts: 2189 From: Oregon Joined: |
Hey Pecos, I liked your old av so much better. It was so trippy Yaro, I liked it too. Here is the artists website with more of his art and the story behind it. The animation artist Bennett is a very interesting guy. 403 Forbidden
lfen
|
|||||||||||||||||||
sidelined Member (Idle past 5930 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
Nighttrain
In the Ozarks, we call all critters without laigs a 'reptile.' `Cept fer them revenooers. An' we don' call them revnooers.Theys just what we call terget practise.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member |
Thanks Ned. I never knew how that was done.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024