Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   To "Believe in God/Jesus" Means
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 41 of 78 (195191)
03-29-2005 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by purpledawn
03-29-2005 12:09 PM


Re: Authors of the OT
I do like the way they teach with stories. The moral of the story is clear. The method reminds me of the Native American stories I've read.
i've been thinking about this for a while, and i don't think i agree at all any more.
jar suggested in If Genesis is Metaphorical, what's the metaphor?:
quote:
Can we walk through the sections of Genesis and discuss the various lessons to be learned from each?
i was very interested in this idea. if you're up for it, start another thread, and i'm sure both jar and i will participate.
i suggested a starting place in response to jar:
quote:
i'd like to start with genesis 12:10-13:2, 20:1-18, 26:6-17. the three wife-for-sister stories. apparently, the trick worked so well for abraham that he did it twice and is son did it once.
basically, our hereos are rewarded for deception. i'd really like to know where the moral is here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by purpledawn, posted 03-29-2005 12:09 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by purpledawn, posted 03-29-2005 2:57 PM arachnophilia has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 44 of 78 (195290)
03-29-2005 6:17 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by purpledawn
03-29-2005 2:57 PM


Re: Authors of the OT
My journey to understanding the Bible took me back to its roots, Judaism. My reasoning was that the original belonged to them and I wanted to see how they presented its teachings to their people.
same here, actually. i just don't ALWAYS agree. but their take is usually very interesting and seems much more correct and sensible than christian perspectives ever do.
i just don't think that genesis is useful (or written) to teach morality in any kind of way anymore. i used to, but reading it carefully, i could not find moral instruction.
i would like to be convinced differently, of course, but it would probably still fail to change my perspective of the book.
the link is interesting, but still not (technically) correct. the story also happens with isaac and rebekah, and she is not his sister. either way, both isaac and abraham are rewarded for their dishonesty.
i would really like a better reading of the story, as i don't even see a good reason why it should be there one time let alone 3. but apologism isn't really what i'm looking for.
I still find some things I don't agree with, but they at least back up what they teach.
yeah, same here. this is actually the first such point i've run across.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by purpledawn, posted 03-29-2005 2:57 PM purpledawn has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by jar, posted 03-29-2005 6:27 PM arachnophilia has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024