Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,483 Year: 3,740/9,624 Month: 611/974 Week: 224/276 Day: 64/34 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Yaro's 'Logical fallacies' discussion...
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 757 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 31 of 44 (56832)
09-21-2003 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Joralex
09-21-2003 9:07 PM


If what you are trying to do is learn how to read Scripture correctly then you need to start learning to see things in a 'spiritual' way and not with your own (flesh) understanding.
correctly (adverb) - 5.Religion. In accordance with the principles laid out by the particular fundy in that discussion at that particular moment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Joralex, posted 09-21-2003 9:07 PM Joralex has not replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6518 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 32 of 44 (56858)
09-21-2003 11:57 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Joralex
09-21-2003 9:07 PM


That's where you need to do some studying, Yaro. Ever heard of a 'patriarcal society'? By "cutting off" the males the entire line of that society was extinguished forever - spiritually this was necessary because of their spiritual vileness. Same with women that had known men of that society - the spiritual connection had to be broken. BTW - I fully realize that this means nothing (rational) to a materialistic Naturalis
Ever hear of Genocide?! Why dosn't this mean anything to you? Ethnic cleansing is a vile crime, Im sure you wouldn't condone today. Was the situation in Kosovo ok? Isreal?
Give me a break! What kind of an argument is this?
I would apreciate it if you didn't label me, if I were Hindu, I would find this story detstable simply on the grounds of godly mandated pacifisim.
I am neither, I am totaly Agnostic if you must know. I simply don't belive that the Hebrew God is the one true God. He dosn't reaveal himself to me as such.
Yaro, the bottom line is that you appear to be seeking some answers but you are going about it the wrong way. Specifically, you seem already decided that God ISN'T what the Bible says He is and you are on a 'holy mission' to prove it. Try being on a 'holy mission' to see it as the Bible says and everything will fall into place.
I agree... this is the bottom line, and where most of my points of contention originate from.
I would say not that I am on a Holy mission to say that God Isn't what the bible says, Im actually pointing out what he IS, not what you THINK he is.
Let me put it to you this way, if the God in the bible is the God you say he is (all loving, just, mercifull). Then why isn't it evidenced in his actions?
If his actions do not demonstrate these qualities, why should I worship him?
It seems that the only reason to be on his side, would be only one: Fear of Hell. He does no good in these stories, hes a homocidal meglomaniac by any depiction, so why else would I wan't to worship him?
It would be tantamount to sucking up to an evil dictator just so he wont smite you. Why on earth would I wan't this guy as my God? He let people get raped.
And sir, Im sorry, but simply saying "it dosn't say rape" is not an argument. If you are forced to be someones 'wife', the conotations of that are non-consensual sex or otherwise.
Let me put it this way : if you're right, then hundreds of thousands / millions of Bible scholars/Christians have been worshipping a 'false God' - a God that is the opposite of what He has said in His Word. Such a (contrary) God makes absolutely no sense in light of the ordered, rational universe that we inhabit. Therefore, either He doesn't exist or your (contrary) 'god' doesn't exist. Since God clearly exists (by the abundance of evidence this is supported) then it must be your (contrary) 'god' that doesn't exist.
This is a non-argument. What evidence? Thousands of theologians and scholars belive in vishnu, and or Budah. Others don't belive in Gods at all. This is not a valid point.
It isn't beside the point. If what you are trying to do is learn how to read Scripture correctly then you need to start learning to see things in a 'spiritual' way and not with your own (flesh) understanding.
This is an interesting argument. Why is it, that when I read these stories, I get disgusted? Im not makeing my disgust up ya know, deep down in my heart, I know killing babies is wrong.
Spirtually, I would not be capable of dashing a baby against a rock. Sorry, that's not in my soul. Please forgive me if my heart isn't with the 'richiusness' in these particular bible passages.
There is no "evil" in a command from God. You are trying to judge an action of God using your own understanding. That will get you nowhere... fast!
This is the crux of your whole argument. The sticking point of the debate. If God says it, it can't be wrong.
Well heck, God says kill a babie, rape a virgin... oops sorry, force her to mary you after killing her family... It's ok. He made the rules, so he can break them right?
So if he says he is all loving, then telling people to kill babies is a loving act. If he is all loving then raping people is a loving act.
He is sending them to be raped because he loves them. Just like he's sending the majority of the human race to hell, because he loves them.
Have you ever stoped to consider, that perhapse to a non-beliver this sounds ludacriss? And it also makes it impossible for one such as me to belive. Because it requires me to accept, what I know, in the depths of my heart isn't right!
If I can't read the bible, and see God's love, can't see the reason, how on earth am I gonna be 'saved'?
I mean, here is the document, and to any person who isn't already a beliver, it dson't make sense, and the only way to make it make sense is to belive it makes sense. This sounds delusional to me.
Im sorry to say this, but this argument will not go anywhere. It's ultimate conclusion is: If God says to rape someone, or murder a babie, it is a just and good thing, and God is doing it out of love. And this is true because it was presupposed.
And to me, this makes no sense.
[This message has been edited by Yaro, 09-21-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Joralex, posted 09-21-2003 9:07 PM Joralex has not replied

  
Rei
Member (Idle past 7035 days)
Posts: 1546
From: Iowa City, IA
Joined: 09-03-2003


Message 33 of 44 (56864)
09-22-2003 12:22 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Joralex
09-21-2003 9:14 PM


She wasin a f***ing city - walking home from a friend's house. It's not "akin to being in a field" - she was *In A City*. For God's sake, are you so inhuman that you don't care that a 14 year old girl was raped, and consider anyone who gives a sh** to be an "irrational pro-feminist"????
Excuse me, but F*** You.! Ok?
(my apologies to the admins.. if this were in person, he probably wouldn't still be standing... I cannot even begin to comprehend people who try to excuse rape, it just drives me mad)
------------------
"Illuminant light,
illuminate me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Joralex, posted 09-21-2003 9:14 PM Joralex has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Yaro, posted 09-22-2003 12:27 AM Rei has not replied
 Message 35 by Joralex, posted 09-22-2003 11:21 PM Rei has replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6518 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 34 of 44 (56866)
09-22-2003 12:27 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Rei
09-22-2003 12:22 AM


[sarcasm]
Rei, people are raped because of one of two reasons:
1) they deserve it.
2) because God loves them.
Now dosn't that make sense?
And the perfect infalible law of God says, that if she don't screem, then she wasn't raped. So there are only 2 options:
1) If she is betrothed, she should be stoned to death.
2) If she wasn't, shes gotta mary the rapist.
You should tell her she's living in sin, before God in his all loving wisdom, sends her sinfull rape-desrving ass back to hell were she came from.
[/sacrasm]
[This message has been edited by Yaro, 09-21-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Rei, posted 09-22-2003 12:22 AM Rei has not replied

  
Joralex
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 44 (57064)
09-22-2003 11:21 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Rei
09-22-2003 12:22 AM


Rei : I generally don't reply to people as "cultured" as you but I'll make an exception here.
She wasin a f***ing city - walking home from a friend's house. It's not "akin to being in a field" - she was *In A City*. For God's sake, are you so inhuman that you don't care that a 14 year old girl was raped, and consider anyone who gives a sh** to be an "irrational pro-feminist"????
If you promise to employ your neurons instead of your hormones you may go back and read what I wrote. God (all-knowing God) knows exactly what happened and exactly what the circumstances were. Try repeating that a couple of dozen times and maybe it'll sink in.
Excuse me, but F*** You.! Ok?
My, my, my... such articulate culture. Let me guess : Yale? Harvard? Or was it MIT?
(my apologies to the admins..
TRANSLATION : I can act as a savage moron as long as I end it on a human note - that makes it all okay.
if this were in person, he probably wouldn't still be standing...
Ah, now it's back to my beastly, savage ways : violence is the solution... hormones rule over neurons!
( ... now I need to apologize to the admin again...)
I cannot even begin to comprehend people who try to excuse rape, it just drives me mad)
There's my "apology" - disguised as "I'm such a caring, sensitive person... please understand me."
I ain't buying today, Rei - tomorrow doesn't look good for you either. Your pathetic drama is transparent. Try reading for comprehension next time and maybe you'll spare all of us a second-rate acting performance, okay.
Joralex

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Rei, posted 09-22-2003 12:22 AM Rei has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Yaro, posted 09-23-2003 1:41 AM Joralex has not replied
 Message 38 by Rei, posted 09-23-2003 2:29 AM Joralex has not replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6518 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 36 of 44 (57085)
09-23-2003 1:41 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by Joralex
09-22-2003 11:21 PM


I can sympathise with Rei's frustration.
What difference does it make if God knew? And how is it akin to being in a field?
If God knew, then he should have stoped it... You know, I can already tell what your gonna say about that statement. But it brings me to another question:
God dosn't interfere because of free will I suppose, even on something so vile as a rape. Yet, he commands an army of his followers to murder babies and chilldren, and... well rape.
So, an all powerfull, all loving God, is seen going out of his way time and time again, to kill people, yet he can't take a second out of his day to foil the rape of a 14 year old?
How is this all loving?
Is it Gods loving plan, that this girl should be lovingly raped?
If you take the bible litteraly, she didn't call out, she wan't betrothed. Thus she has to marry the man... or perhapse if she was betrothed, be stoned to death.
Dosn't that follow from biblical law?
[This message has been edited by Yaro, 09-23-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Joralex, posted 09-22-2003 11:21 PM Joralex has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 37 of 44 (57099)
09-23-2003 2:26 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Joralex
09-21-2003 9:14 PM


And do you think that the Creator of the universe, the Omniscient, all powerful God, doesn't know about the 14-year-old's situation?
Who cares what God knows? It's what the people who read his Bible are going to do that Rei is obviously concerned about. Unless God tells them differently, they're going to follow his words, which means they're either going to force her to marry the rapist (setting her up to be raped her whole life) or stone her to death. Now, explain to me how God knowing the situation matters one bit when the people who are going to stone her to death don't know?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Joralex, posted 09-21-2003 9:14 PM Joralex has not replied

  
Rei
Member (Idle past 7035 days)
Posts: 1546
From: Iowa City, IA
Joined: 09-03-2003


Message 38 of 44 (57101)
09-23-2003 2:29 AM
Reply to: Message 35 by Joralex
09-22-2003 11:21 PM


Joralex - I have a question for you.
Have you ever seen anyone have a flashback to being raped?
------------------
"Illuminant light,
illuminate me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Joralex, posted 09-22-2003 11:21 PM Joralex has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by crashfrog, posted 09-23-2003 2:34 AM Rei has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 39 of 44 (57103)
09-23-2003 2:34 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by Rei
09-23-2003 2:29 AM


No offense, Rei - and I sympathise, I truly do, with any victim of rape - but sexists usually aren't swayed by emotional or visceral appeals.
It's been my experience that any person who holds repellant views (racists, sexists, etc) does so only because they've been able to suppress their natural revulsion. Trying to appeal at that level won't work because they're already too good at ignoring it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Rei, posted 09-23-2003 2:29 AM Rei has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Rei, posted 09-23-2003 3:37 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Rei
Member (Idle past 7035 days)
Posts: 1546
From: Iowa City, IA
Joined: 09-03-2003


Message 40 of 44 (57108)
09-23-2003 3:37 AM
Reply to: Message 39 by crashfrog
09-23-2003 2:34 AM


I probably should leave this thread... it's not good for me to be here. There's too much emotion, and not a strong enough medium to express it... I should go if I want to have a shot at getting to sleep tonight. She was more than just a friend... she was my partner, years ago. She was the sweetest thing... I just can't imagine that happening to her, and it hurts to even picture it... and when a someone like Joralex comes in here and tries to justify it as it somehow being her fault...
Anyway, I should go.
------------------
"Illuminant light,
illuminate me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by crashfrog, posted 09-23-2003 2:34 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Kapyong
Member (Idle past 3464 days)
Posts: 344
Joined: 05-22-2003


Message 41 of 44 (57173)
09-23-2003 8:53 AM


Disgusted
I agree with Rei,
Joralex's views are evil, disgusting savagery.
Iasion

  
AdminBrian
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 44 (57191)
09-23-2003 10:27 AM


This thread is getting a little bit out of hand. It is fully understandable that people will get over heated due to the sensitive issues that are being discussed. Although an emotional outburst can be justified, it really doesn't acheive anything other than upsetting the people who actually care about others.
An angry, emotional response just directs attention away from the real issues and may mean that certain claims go unanswered.
Try to stay on topic, and keep personal insults out of it (I know it is difficult), any more insults and we could have this thread closed for a 'cooling off' period, or longer.
AdminBrian.

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by Yaro, posted 09-24-2003 6:35 PM AdminBrian has not replied

  
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6518 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 43 of 44 (57539)
09-24-2003 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by AdminBrian
09-23-2003 10:27 AM


Joralex? Are you still out there?
If you wan't to continue the discusion i am ready to. I did reply to your last, on topic, post.
[This message has been edited by Yaro, 09-24-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by AdminBrian, posted 09-23-2003 10:27 AM AdminBrian has not replied

  
AdminBrian
Inactive Member


Message 44 of 44 (57540)
09-24-2003 6:38 PM


My thanks to everyone for observing a cooling down period.
Remember to focus on the issues, how ever difficult it may be.
AdminBrian.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024