quote:
Originally posted by Mammuthus:
I already debunked your entire argument in post 5..and met your challange...so yes debate over..evolution is the truth and creationism is the dilusion of those unable to understand science and feel like they have to compensate by being offensive.
I must admit to some confusion. Wordswordsman posted a question by de Beer as his argument against the theory of evolution and cited an article by Wells as helpfull background material. In post five, you answered with an opposing article that supposedly "debunked" Wells. There was no mention in that article of de Beer. How then can you say that you have debunked the whole argument when you have only made reference to the paranthetical?
I am very interested in hearing an answer to de Beer's question. Can you provide one?
™ Version 4.2