Peg writes:
i hear you saying there is no evidence of the flood, but what if scientists have found it yet interpret the evidence some other way.
The amount of evidence against any global flood in human history is so gargantuan, only a person who denies the common definition of reality could possibly support such a rejection of all geology, most all biology, and a lot of physics, chemistry, linguistics, anthropology, Biblical scholarship and indeed what was once called common sense.
Either virtually all scientists and intellectuals over the last 200 years are liars and/or idiots or the creationist movement is intellectually and spiritually dishonest. Take your pick, but first consider Jesus' admonition to feed the poor and heal the sick.
Here is why
Message 1
I am reluctant to bring this up because debating the 100 categories in general lead to a admin nightmare but my hand is forced, so pick one and let loose the logic and science. After that you still have the other 99 to go.
I seriously doubt that as a hard core creationist you can actually follow a link you may be afraid of, please feel free to surprise me.
Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza
™ Version 4.2