Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Noah's Ark volume calculation
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 54 of 347 (490235)
12-03-2008 7:18 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Peg
12-03-2008 7:11 AM


Re: Ark Size
Peg writes:
but through DNA analysis, the nationality can be identified...we know that it could be an asian person, or it could be an african, or it could be a Caucasian for example.
That's not their nationality though, is it? It's their "race", they're still all homo sapiens.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Peg, posted 12-03-2008 7:11 AM Peg has not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 101 of 347 (490430)
12-04-2008 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 100 by johnfolton
12-04-2008 1:26 PM


Re: Do you really believe this?
The bible is inerrant
The bible is anything BUT inerrant.
the fossils found quick frozen has been found in the northern hemisphere. right?
In the northern hemisphere, yes, but far from quickly frozen, though nowhere is this mentioned in the bible. Oh and those aren't fossils.
Edited by Huntard, : Thanks to Ned, now I don't look like a loony

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by johnfolton, posted 12-04-2008 1:26 PM johnfolton has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by NosyNed, posted 12-04-2008 2:13 PM Huntard has replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 105 of 347 (490439)
12-04-2008 2:42 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by NosyNed
12-04-2008 2:13 PM


Re: His link
No I hadn't, but the reply was more to the fact that Mammoths were found in the northern hemisphere, all that other stuff is just plain wrong, I think I'll go edit my reply though, people might think me a loony, thanks for pointing it out.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by NosyNed, posted 12-04-2008 2:13 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by NosyNed, posted 12-04-2008 2:55 PM Huntard has replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 107 of 347 (490443)
12-04-2008 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by NosyNed
12-04-2008 2:55 PM


Re: Linked article goes wrong in 2 sentences
Yes I read it now, and also stopped after that point. Seems great minds still think alike.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by NosyNed, posted 12-04-2008 2:55 PM NosyNed has not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 124 of 347 (490604)
12-06-2008 8:04 AM
Reply to: Message 123 by johnfolton
12-06-2008 2:40 AM


Re: How many 'kind' on the ark?
well, this section comes from a KJV bible that is clearly not "counterfeit"
Gen. 7:21-23:
quote:
[21] And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
[22] All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
[23] And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground, both man, and cattle, and the creeping things, and the fowl of the heaven; and they were destroyed from the earth: and Noah only remained alive, and they that were with him in the ark.
So, you're still lying in the face of god.
Oh, and the quote was from here: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/k/kjv/browse.html
Hard to deny this one, isn't it? Unless you want to claim the King James Bible was made by satan. I don;t think too many christians will agree with you on that.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by johnfolton, posted 12-06-2008 2:40 AM johnfolton has not replied

Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 226 of 347 (495545)
01-23-2009 10:06 AM
Reply to: Message 217 by homunculus
01-22-2009 10:15 PM


Re: Giant bones
homunculus writes:
first, i would like to bring to your attention the Smithsonian, national geographic and a fistful of other geographical and historical "authorities" are corrupt to their toes, like many other acclaimed "authorities".
Got any evidence for that, or is it just wild conjecture?
not only do they play an extreme bias for evolution, like most evolutionists, but they do an incredible, high budget job of covering up the discovery of giant human skeletons (found primarily in the middle east/northern Africa) in an attempt to disprove the bible, once, I believe the information was readily available.
They don't do it because they want to disprove the bible, they want to disprove the edda, there are far more gaints in there thne there are in the bible, and they don't want to die in battle (that's why they are scientists), so the cowards try to disprove it.
of course, the legend, DR. Kent hovind's material
A legend of lies and misrepresentation and fraud perhaps. The dimensions on that bone are wrong, it should've been much more like an elephant's leg, this is way too slender.

I hunt for the truth

This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by homunculus, posted 01-22-2009 10:15 PM homunculus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 231 by homunculus, posted 01-24-2009 12:20 AM Huntard has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024