Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 84 (8915 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 07-15-2019 3:53 PM
29 online now:
dwise1, edge, jar, ooh-child, PaulK, Thugpreacha (AdminPhat) (6 members, 23 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: 4petdinos
Upcoming Birthdays: lopezeast0211, Theodoric
Post Volume:
Total: 856,796 Year: 11,832/19,786 Month: 1,613/2,641 Week: 122/708 Day: 56/66 Hour: 3/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Endtime Prophecy and the European Union
Larni
Member
Posts: 3984
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 96 of 313 (700095)
05-30-2013 8:55 AM
Reply to: Message 85 by PaulGL
05-29-2013 5:18 PM


Re: Hal Lindsey
I think your post is in pretty poor taste. You say your sin of false prophecy has been taken from you but you're burping it back up with this non-Scriptural nonsense.

Go and sin no moar.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by PaulGL, posted 05-29-2013 5:18 PM PaulGL has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by PaulGL, posted 05-30-2013 1:15 PM Larni has responded
 Message 117 by Larni, posted 05-30-2013 5:52 PM Larni has not yet responded

    
Larni
Member
Posts: 3984
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 117 of 313 (700163)
05-30-2013 5:52 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by Larni
05-30-2013 8:55 AM


Re: Hal Lindsey
These are not the droids you are looking for: move alone.

Edited by Larni, : No reason given.


The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Larni, posted 05-30-2013 8:55 AM Larni has not yet responded

    
Larni
Member
Posts: 3984
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 119 of 313 (700168)
05-30-2013 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by PaulGL
05-30-2013 1:15 PM


Re: Hal Lindsey
Yes you did. But it is not me that you argue with; it is the Bible.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53

The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286

Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134


This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by PaulGL, posted 05-30-2013 1:15 PM PaulGL has not yet responded

    
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019