Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,787 Year: 4,044/9,624 Month: 915/974 Week: 242/286 Day: 3/46 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy ⇒

Genesis: is it to be taken literally?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Genesis: is it to be taken literally?
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 132 of 301 (129366)
08-01-2004 5:48 PM 		Reply to: Message 131 by mpaul73
08-01-2004 5:36 PM

honestly
Georgi Gladyhev demands that if any of what I said was true there must be a COMPLETION of the process. There is not doubt that my attempts to bring this all togther DO have something to do with what in the Defender's STUDY Bible Morris refers numbers for. It is possbile that by brining it to China some to the issue of dx/dy which were symbols for Russel might be the line in Mendel better paid for. I can (not)say how economics it to NOT affect the information age of biology but it should be the population not the $ that drives any change that the pinheads make whalegums for in that part of theworld.
​
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 08-01-2004 04:49 PM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by mpaul73, posted 08-01-2004 5:36 PM mpaul73 has not replied
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 3428
From: Ithaca,NY, USA
Joined: 12-20-2001

Normal Thread Display
Message 294 of 301 (182387)
02-01-2005 4:42 PM 		Reply to: Message 293 by Soplar
02-01-2005 4:35 PM

Re: Response re My Old/Closed Thread
The reason you dont have the compared response you sought IS because as I know and have never seen a comprehensive discussion anywhere about the difference between the argument from design and physicOtheology. Till then we are all in this shady dark place of comfort.
​
This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 02-01-2005 16:43 AM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 293 by Soplar, posted 02-01-2005 4:35 PM Soplar has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024